ah you are trying to prove lemmy was a more worthwhile title capture than cotto, by comparing which of lemmy and cotto defended the title most. so we must ask for comparison - did Lemieux ever defend the MW title from 155-160, same thing. NO. therefore your attempt to prove cotto is less, proves they are worth the same. think it thru ahead next time.
Cotto never fought at or allowed his opponent to weigh in at the weight limit of 160.....he was a light mid middleweight champion
was that the exact moment that you suddenly realised that Canelo had 3 other losses on his record too?
again, you are trying to prove the win was worth less than the win over lemmy, by asking which had more MW title defences. u were shown to fail - both cotto and lemmy have same title defences at mw, zero.
Herol has become a Canelo nuthugger. Just when I thought he'd reached the lowest point he could he decides to let off a hand grenade. Don't click on the unignore button ladies and gentlemen.
But Lemieux never drained or contracted his fights at a weight less than the middleweight limit of 160, unlike Cotto. To say they are one of the same is in itself a fail and is a Corbyn/Labour type lie, a lie that the majority see yet the narrow minded, smarter than he thinks he is individual does not, such individual is the type to allow alpha males like myself to sexually satisfy their respective wives/partners to a euphoric level of which the beta male could only wish.
that would be the dfference,not Odi's failed argument. the difference 1.5 lbs makes is a tangible thing, that I respect.
Joe Gallagher recently travelled over to Mexico with a bunch of his fighters and he said he couldn't believe how many people there are over there who don't like Clenelo, which FTR is something I've been saying on here for years.
Lol this is Gold.Isal and Shadow must be rolling round in stitches about me being called a Canelo fan boy.