Based off of Oakland's thread. Echols is a journeyman and Harry Greb is the greatest boxer of all time, but Echols is newer I guess so it's fair? What do the fans think.
Hes like santa or the boogeyman, he's a myth classicists made up to deny that Floyd Mayweather is the GOAT I mean think about it, no footage of his fights exist. Sounds sus to me.
Seems silly to compare Echols to an all time great. I'm not sure he'd even beat the tough guys of Hagler's era: Hamsho, Scypion, Sibson, Parker, Roldan, Fletcher.