Let us examine Floyd Mayweather's best opponents

There are too many points that you have made that are invalid and can be ruled null. I don't have time to go through this but I think this has been covered in other threads before many times over.

 

Why does Pacquiao always gets a pass? Cause ever since he move up at ww? He mostly face fighters that are either way past their primes? Or in a bs catchweights.

 

Floyd started call out oscar which was before oscar fought either sturm or Hopkins. Plus floyd wanted to fight Mosley and was at ringside when mosley easily destroy Vargas but Mosley declined saying he got to do go to a dentist.

 

Tell me which atg fighters in their primes that Pacquiao clearly beat without catchweights?

 

Oh god no not a floyd thread his supporters will be all over it like mcdonalds coffee on a lap. we're doomed.

 

Lol wrong. Barrera before the Pacquiao was fighting in his 60 something pro fights and wasnt the same fighter as he once was. Plus before the Pacquiao fight? Barrera was dealing with steel plates in his head and couldn't train much cause of the fire in his camp. So try again.

 

This. I always laugh when people call Canelo, who was a unified champion with over 40 professional fights and almost 10 years as a pro green.

That would make almost every champion in boxing today green.

 

It's definitely not a clear robbery. Could go either way, calling it a clear robbery does clear robberies an injustice.

Something like Chavez vs Whitaker or Pacquiao vs Bradley is a clear robbery.

In fairness here it's not Floyd's fault that Del a Hoya and Mosley were from the generation before, and they were still some of the best options available.

Pacquiao is inexcusable, for both men. Both had plenty of opportunities to fight eachother and could've in 2010.

Canelo had 10 or so title fights at that point and was undefeated coming off one of his best wins. He was drained but he took the fight and actually offered the catch-weight. And it's a win that has aged brilliantly.
Not saying he beat the best Canelo but it's not a win that should be discounted.

So Pacquiao saying he's doesn't like blood testing is Mayweather's fault? Everyone else Floyd fought had it.


And this isn't even hate, I think Pacquiao's greater but Mayweather gets overly hated on. His résumé under the microscope is clearly not what it is on the surface, but it's far from poor and every other résumé under the microscope is worse than it is surface level

 

Floyd has huge asterisks next to his biggest wins.

Castillo

• Clear loss

Marquez

• Cheated Marquez on the scales

Canelo

• Catchweight drained the fatty

Maidana

• Draw is the best scenario for Floyd (I had him losing)
• Wouldn't let Maidana wear his preferred, commission-approved gloves

Pacquiao

• Pacquiao was injured and denied a shot over a checkmark on a box
• Floyd used illegal PEDs

 

I'm a fan of both, but lets look at Pacqiuao

Knocked out by nobodies early on

Lost to Morales first time out and beat a shell twice after

Lost all four with Marquez, but I will be kind and allow him to have the second fight

Oscar looked like a holocaust victim and hadn't fought at welter for years

Drained Cotto and Miguel was still getting over the marg beating

Beat a shot Marg after he was smashed by Mosley and stopped by miguel. Oh did I mention he was drained? Lol

Beat a 50 year Mosley who Floyd already dismantled earlier

Only beat Hatton, because he was all over the place after losing to Floyd and had a new trainer, that didn't suit him

Lost to an Older Floyd easily and **** all was wrong with his shoulder

Should of probably got the decision with horn, but struggled badly with a bum

We can do this **** with any fighter

Why don't you just be mature enough to admit Floyd is an all time great, but you believe Manny is better?

 

FFS
This thread again