Spence UD. Thurman couldn't handle a old pacquiao, he's got no chance against a younger bigger spence.
Spence would beat him a lot more clearly than he did Porter, it's just a better matchup stylistically for him. The key component in that fight would be Errol's bodypunching, something that seems to really trouble Thurman. Keith isn't going to jump in on Errol and make it a phone booth fight like Shawn did last night. He'll utilize his movement and end up fighting the majority of the match at a distance which would bode well for Errol.
Spence would tko or ko an already damage chin of Thurman. Lopez exposed Thurman weak chin which is why Pacquiao fought him.
I wasn't comparing styles I am saying If he can't beat a old pacquiao how is he going to beat a prime spence, I don't think of margarito when I see spence either.
I'm sorry, but I think Thurman decisions him. Thurman has exceptional lateral movement, Ring IQ, Can switch, can hurt you, stellar jab, and he actually knows how to judge distant pretty well/ Please, don't use Pac-Man as a measuring stick to a potential bout between Thurman and Spence. Pacquiao has foot speed while Spence is rather slow. Spence got exposed last night.
He was probably losing the brook fight after six rounds and he turned that around by picking good hard accurate shots, it wasn't brawling. I just don't see spence as a brawler he's a very good technical boxer, remember porter is a hard man to look good against for anyone.