Best I Faced: Jung Koo Chang

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by roughdiamond, Oct 2, 2019.


  1. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,101
    19,245
    Jul 25, 2015
    New article interviewing Jung Koo Chang on his career.

    'In his prime, Jung-Koo Chang was a force of nature, a 108-pound wrecking machine. He one of the greatest fighters to ever come from South Korea. In the 1980s, he held the junior flyweight division record of 16 defenses.

    Chang was born in Busan, South Korea, on February 4, 1963. He was the youngest of five children from a poor family.

    “When I was a child, I always fought my friends and also played soccer,” Chang told The Ring through Tomoyuki Kataoka. “I became interested in boxing in 1975, when I watched a fight between Ben Villaflor and Hyun-Chi Kim.

    “I decided to do boxing and joined a boxing gym called Busan Far East General Gym, on August 11, 1975.”

    Incredibly Chang never fought an amateur contest and made his professional debut as a 17-year-old in November 1980. He won his first 18 bouts, notably besting former WBC titlist Amado Ursua.

    His promoter was able to tempt the silky smooth WBC beltholder Hilario Zapata to South Korea, in September, 1982. The two fought on near-even terms but Zapata retained his title by razor-thin split decision.

    Six months later, a weight-drained Zapata returned to South Korea and this time Chang demolished the future Hall-of-Famer in three blitzkrieg rounds. It was understandably his proudest moment in boxing.

    “When I won the WBC light flyweight championship at the age of 20,” he said. “They did a parade of cars in my hometown, Busan.”

    Full:
    https://www.ringtv.com/578716-best-i-faced-jung-koo-chang/
     
  2. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,101
    19,245
    Jul 25, 2015
    Interesting that he picked Gonzalez as the best all round fighter.
     
  3. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,092
    15,555
    Dec 20, 2006
    Pretty cool that Yuh helped ring to translate this as well. I like to check these out from time to time. But....morlocks is not going to be pleased to see another Chang thread lol
     
  4. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,092
    15,555
    Dec 20, 2006
    By the way why do you find it interesting that he picked Gonzalez?
     
    roughdiamond likes this.
  5. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,101
    19,245
    Jul 25, 2015
    Fighters usually pick someone they beat / were clearly better than.
     
  6. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,101
    19,245
    Jul 25, 2015
    I get it. He doesn't think highly of Chang. He doesn't have to comment about it on every single thing about him.
     
    PhillyPhan69 likes this.
  7. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,937
    Nov 21, 2009
    I liked it. I thought the yuh connection was cool and understand Gonzalez being his best. Like I said Zapata was finished the rest were not that good. Chang was great but had no worthy adversaries until Gonzales and co after he came back. I just think you guys way overrate him. I find Yuh to be way mre exciting. I have both their sets and Gushiken Khosai Johnson(who despite what fleabag says really was a monster). I did love Changs honesty. I followed him from the beginning thro Koizumi. Without studying Joe Koizumi's work, you ain't studying asian/oriental boxing.
     
    Last edited: Oct 2, 2019
  8. PhillyPhan69

    PhillyPhan69 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,092
    15,555
    Dec 20, 2006
    Does this mean that you don’t find Chitalada x’s 2 Torres x’s 3 Tokashiki or even Ursua/Lopez as high quality opponents? Because if so this time I would be the one who is bamboobalized
     
  9. The Morlocks

    The Morlocks Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,717
    8,937
    Nov 21, 2009
    Not particularly. Weak non hitters in a weak made up division for those that couldnt cut it at Flyweight. Just like supermiddle was for fat lazy middles and lightheavies who couldnt cut it. Mediocrity vs mediocrity can be good. But not great as in the fighter vs a real great.
     
  10. Henry Hank

    Henry Hank Mexicans Run Houston Full Member

    471
    688
    Aug 30, 2019
  11. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,101
    19,245
    Jul 25, 2015
    What?