Lloyd Marshall vs RJJ @ Super Middle

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by InMemoryofJakeLamotta, Oct 4, 2019.

  1. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2017
    Messages:
    16,183
    Likes Received:
    11,663
    The Marshall who KO Charles vs prime RJJ.
     
  2. thistle

    thistle Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2016
    Messages:
    7,360
    Likes Received:
    7,871
    Lloyd Marshall

    he would be a Tarver for Roy, with more Flare and Finesse than Jones ever thought another fighter other than himself could ever possess.

    Marshall - RJJ before Roy even existed!!!
     
  3. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2016
    Messages:
    13,973
    Likes Received:
    19,002
    Hmm?,,,I'd go with Lloyd , I'm probably wrong but....
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  4. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2019
    Messages:
    27,131
    Likes Received:
    44,895
    Marshall.

    Charles > Roy
    For like almost everything. Marshall times him and takes his head.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  5. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2017
    Messages:
    7,829
    Likes Received:
    13,119
    Jones.

    Marshall may have been Jones before Jones but that doesn't automatically make him better.
     
    InMemoryofJakeLamotta likes this.
  6. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2017
    Messages:
    16,183
    Likes Received:
    11,663
    Jones being more modern and fighting in color doesn't make him better, either.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  7. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2010
    Messages:
    3,732
    Likes Received:
    2,571
    I think Roy struggles with the best of the best at 175 - I'd pick Charles, Moore, Spinks and Foster to all beat him at that weight. At 168 and below though he's a tough match-up for any fighter in history.

    This fight is far more nuanced than Marshall beating Charles so he beats Jones; if you want to play boxing arithmetic there are people who beat Marshall that Jones would be heavily favoured against.

    While it's possible that Marshall could time Roy and hurt him, Marshall wasn't made of granite himself, and Jones could bang at 168 and below. He was a one-punch KO threat and he could land that leaping left hook out of nowhere. You could say the same about Marshall, but Jones had a different level of speed which was the difference in most of his fights.

    There'd probably be a lot of cat and mouse in this one. I think ultimately speed kills though. Either Jones lands a flash knockdown or two to secure a points win in a cagey affair, or he lands one right on the button and takes Marshall out.

    I'm not ragging on Marshall, who fought much tougher opposition in a harder era than Jones. If we're picking Marshall to demolish Jones though, we may as well say that the best fighter of the late 90s would be just a contender at his peak weight if he was around in the 40s.
     
  8. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2017
    Messages:
    16,183
    Likes Received:
    11,663
    Well said.
     
    Shisha and Oddone like this.
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2005
    Messages:
    52,759
    Likes Received:
    44,320
    I'm not sure if you are referring to Marshall's win over Charles? If so Charles tho a top fighter was a different man prior to his military service. When he came back he seemed more robust and developed and really hit his straps. Charles came back to beat Marshall a couple of times tho you can also say Marshall was past peak.

    Great match up. I'd lean narrowly to Roy but i wouldn't count Marshall out one bit. What a great fighter and have a look at some of those names on his record.
     
  10. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2012
    Messages:
    26,524
    Likes Received:
    17,577
    Jones
     
  11. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    61,446
    Likes Received:
    45,942
    I know it's fun to get your nostalgia on but Roy was damn near unbeatable at 160-168 during his prime. He didn't even have close fights and that's including HOF'er like Toney and BHop. Marshall was plenty beatable. He seemed to bank on his reflexes, hands down, a la Jones but I don't think he was in Jones' department in that regard. Hell, I've never seen anyone in Jones' department in that regard.
     
  12. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2017
    Messages:
    7,829
    Likes Received:
    13,119
    No doubt.
     
  13. Jel

    Jel Obsessive list maker Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2017
    Messages:
    7,829
    Likes Received:
    13,119
    Perfectly put.

    I don’t see that Marshall has any natural advantages here. Like you say, Roy at this weight was pretty much untouchable. He would have been quicker and I suspect he hit harder than Marshall too, although Lloyd could definitely bang as well.

    But I don’t see any obvious reason to pick Marshall over Jones, not with any degree of surety, anyway.
     
  14. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2017
    Messages:
    16,183
    Likes Received:
    11,663
    Yes...yes it is!
     
  15. Shisha

    Shisha New Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2019
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    12
    Is it a common thing for people to pick the older fighter in these forums?