The point is historically as a middleweight or p4p Walker is always rated. The idea that Steele rates with Walker is revisionist bull****. It’s not supported by history. Period.
There point is history means nothing matched against their army of knowledge and all historians pre 2015 were weak minded morons lucky to be able to use a crosswalk much less evaluate great fighters.
I thought you were parting ways with us? Yet you continually insult. Think about something else. The video is almost uploaded, you know.
Usually I write this crap from my phone but rough is so entertaining with his ramblings I put it on the big screen so my old buds can read it. We await with bated breathe his next post and the upload of the century.
Well even if I upload, silly old non boxers will just criticise from the sidelines like they usually do. Don't worry, I'll share if you want it.
You inane platitudes don't register. Be specific. Compare their top opponents at middle. Compare them stylistically. Cite their major wins. Do anything but vaguely refer to "boxing historians" who you don't even name but seem so sure in citing.
YOU ARE BECOMING THE HIGHLIGHT OF MY BUDDS TRIP FROM HELL'S KITCHEN TO SEE ME ROUGH. PLEASE GIVE US THE UPLOAD.
Here you go. Have at it. This is only one round though. The context. My third bout, his thirteenth. Im alot better since then I've had 10 now. Slow down the speed to 0.5 once the bout starts, it's sped up for some reason. I'm the black and red. Deleting tomorrow. This content is protected