I was not wrong about Bitcoin when it was $10.00 I was not wrong about Beterbiev in 2015 ..... If only my marriage was so solid....
No. Prograis and Taylor are good fighters but not on the Berebiev/Nail level. Winner is not p4p. If the winner goes on to clean the division up and beat Ramirez, they have a case fo taking GGG, Estrada, and Pacquiao out of the p4p talks. GGG shouldn't be p4p anymore anyways.
Loma is too high. Don't know how anyone could put him above Canelo, him and Crawford's resume practically identical so they should be around the same.
I'd put Beterbiev about #5. My list is about Loma Inoue Usyk Ginger nuts Bebertiev Crawford Estrada GGG Spence Pac
Based on his past standards for sure.For some reason we’re all ok for Canelo to be in close fights though? I’m not disputing his PFP status and I reckon if he was winning his fights by knockout or by unanimous decisions he’d be number one.
1. Inoue 2. Loma/Crawford 4. Estrada 5. Usyk 6. Beterbiev 7. Pacquiao 8. Alvarez 9. Williams 10.Navarrete
All depends how you define PFP I guess.I have a simple method that kinda disregards resume as some guys don’t get the opportunities that others get. Bookies often decide who’s PFP by who they keep backing.
Manny s had a complete turn around lol and Golovkin will naturally find himself as a possible underdog from now on. There’s no skullduggery on Mannys behalf as his performances have warranted his inclusion imo.
Hype job. One 8/10 victory This is politics. I bet Putin paid Oscar for the slot. Manny beating Thurman>>Beterbiev-Gvozdyk. Fun fact Thurman is younger than Gvozdyk & has a better resume than Gvozdyk.
