I like Canelo and I usually side with the fighter over the promoter but ODLH did a great job

I was referring to getting serious attention even after losing a fight and capitalizing on that in a positive way. That's what I was referring to.

 

I know what you were referring to. He got attention but ultimately the fight itself was negative attention. Not saying fighting Floyd did nothing positive for him, but I don't think it was the main factor to him becoming a big star.

My point is that your performance in losing matters. Vitali left a good impression and it helped him.

 

It is definitely not the main reason he became a big star, his in-ring ability is the main reason. The Mayweather fight gave him global attention and his promotional/marketing team took care of the rest. Of course all of that would mean nothing if he didn't actually have great ability.

Alvarez left a good impression too. Casuals(the majority) read/hear "Majority Decision" and that sticks with them. Immediately following this fight, Alvarez went on to make 350k PPV buys fighting Angulo. Do you think he would have made that much fighting Angulo prior to the Mayweather fight?, I don't think so. It wouldn't have been on PPV anyway.

 

I'd bet you ur modship Kovalev would beat beterbiev, Serge.

 

Avatar bet? I got Beterbiev.

 

So you finally admit the Ginger fraud LOST those fights??
Good for you youre finally seeing sense. I'm no hater I just detest Fakers & Frauds eg GBP & his ginger headed stumpy legged cheater

 

No. Im one of those people who made a thread about scoring fights and the vast majority of people in this site proved they had no idea what the 10 pt. must scoring system was.

Do you know what that is and how to use it to score a fight?

 

Canelo won those fights. There is nothing you can say, or type that will change that fact. No amount of crying will change that fact either.

You want to see a real robbery, watch JMM-Pac III.

My post had nothing to do with Canelo winning or losing, but of course you went there. A fighter with multiple losses can still be the most popular fighter in boxing as DLH proved.

That's another thing you got wrong. Canelo has more fans than Golovkin, contrary to what you suggested in the past.

 

Tell ya what. Get a copy of boxing 101, study it & maybe you'll learn something about the sport . That way you wont make such a fool of yourself like you have been doing.
You're fast becoming a troll of year candidate
Without Vegas corruption Clenelo would already have 5 losses on his record

 

I'll put up $100 ...lol

 

Sure, y not..

 

Yes, it’s fairly straightforward.

 

lol.. Fairly straight forward? Let me guess, you think the fighter who lands more punches should be declared the winner?

Defense
Clean Punching
Effective aggression
Ring generalship

Four scoring factors, each scoring factor needs to be considered within three min increments.

I don't see how that is "fairly straightforward," especially in a close fight.

You pretty much confirmed what I initially assumed.

 

anyone can post the criteria. It's applying the criteria which you have no damn clue how to do.... Hell, you needed ME to define champ and titlist for you to change and use instead.