You state Jacobs is a lot bigger than Canelo, but Canelo couldn't make 154 without cutting an arm off so where exactly do you think they could have fought? You're basically saying Jacobs was overly drained against Canelo, cause they fought at 160.
"Everyone said this..." "This is the same board where posters..." Good grief man... is everything an 'all or nothing' with you? Os is just crying about what posters say your thing?
BS. That's like saying Pac will always be remembered for Ariza shakes, being afraid of needles or KTFO6. Most boxers are judged more justly by future generations.
Of course that's how you see it! You lump all in to one group regardless of actual differences. Good message board tactic that people w/o a real point utilize.
I unlike you will give fighters their due if they prove me wrong or have a great performance, you wont you'll just hate and make excuses and give passes to fighters you like.
I will 100% give Canelo credit for WEIGHT DRAINING yet another opponent, except for this one is old and just off the back of a bruising fight to boot. I couldn't believe it when it was announced there was no rehyrdation clause ... AND I WAS RIGHT.
because it is a handpick. It is a risk since Kovalev is still a hard puncher, but Kovalev has lost 2 times and both being stopped. He has weak enough stamina now, and if he goes past 6 or 7 someone can start to hit him and exploit that. It would be a good win, but most people pick Canelo.
