Erík Morales SHREDS Canelo; Says Ginger Fights Old/Shot Fighters!

Elaborate more on that. To my recollection he petitioned and fought for three fights at 155, Lara, Angulo, Kirkland, all non-title fights. The other two fights at 155 were petitioned by his opponent.

You take issue with non-title fights being held a pound above the limit?

 

Remember Mexican fighters are held to higher standards around here.

 

It is true.

Going off my cards, which is how I do things, Canelo has two losses to GGG and one to Lara.
So Canelo's résumé consists of Cotto(Past Prime), Trout, Jacobs and Smith.

So that means that there are plenty of people with better résumés.
Spence, Inoue, Loma, SSR, Gonzalez, Estrada and in fact, going off my own cards, GGG has a better one as well.

Now I do concede that my cards are not official, so I will give you that officially Canelo has a top 2 résumé of prime guys today. His top wins all have an astrix, so I don't have him top 3.
Should he win tonight, fairly, he's number 1 even with the rehydration clause.

A hater implies that there's no reason for me to hate Canelo. I make a point to not like blatant, consistent cheaters

 

Your card doesn't count bro.

 

It does for me. Hence why I go by my own opinions. I also addressed this point.
How does Canelo's bollocks taste bro?

 

Anyone can make up their own little fantasy stories. I prefer using facts.

 

Errr, YES. those two were also accused of being cheaters when they were at the top.

Simply put Canelo is the new IT guy and everything he does will be magnified simply because of that.

 

Facts?
What like that Canelo consistently uses catchweights, rehydration clauses and has been given ridiculous scorecards in very close fights?
Facts like that he popped dirty not once, but twice?
Facts like his résumé is on par with GGGs when you take into account controversy?

You don't use facts, you make excuses for facts. Isal, I genuinely do like you and you know alot more than most of the ******s round here. So answer me this, why does someone who's followed boxing as long as you have, with so much respect for the history, support Canelo?

 

No, there's a difference. Canelo has cheated. Mayweather and Pacquiao were both based on speculation.

 

Erik Morales is a bitter, broke, obese tub of lard

 

Canelo deserves all the crap he gets for testing positive for Clen but he's tested clean right before and after fights so to say that he's a blatant and consistent cheater is also simply hate-fueled speculation.

 

He did, he failed twice.

 

A bit harsh but there's a chance that Morales might just be jealous of Canelo and knows full well that there is a chance Canelo might end up being a greater fighter than him when it's all and done.

 

That fact that you try to spin that "twice" line tells me all I need to know about you. LOL

 

All those things you said can be said about many top fighters. Do you hold all fighters to the same standards? Such as Pacquiao, and Golovkin?

You're also very disingenuous by saying he pooped dirty twice, either that or your not very bright. You do realize that the negative findings were from the same source, right? The tests were three days apart and the second test had even less trace amounts of clenbuterol.

Well the same can be said about GGG. He has 2 controversial wins, one with Jacobs, and one with Derevyanchenko.

Oh, but you probably don't think they're controversial, right? lol Of course.