Dillian Whyte tests positive for banned substance

Where on God's green earth did you get three from? Absolutely not.

 

"The National Anti-Doping Panel is an independent body that determines anti-doping disputes in sport in the United Kingdom. Administered and run by Sport Resolutions, the NADP is funded by the UK government’s Department for Culture Media and Sport. Membership of the NADP is made up of a President, eleven legally qualified arbitrators and ten specialist arbitrators, all of whom have experience in high performance sport, sports science and sports medicine. The NADP is independent of UK Anti-Doping and other sporting bodies."

Go do some research and development buddy. You definitely need it.

Sick and tired of liars.

 

The economic value of an organisation has no correspondence to corruption. Your argument only goes to support my own since surely a poorer organisation would be more susceptible for having their heads turned through brides.

As you rightly say, FIFA is a billion dollar organisation. So where is the motivation or need for a billion dollar to accept brides which we know for a fact has happened? . Because no matter how rich and profitable FIFA are, they understand without athletes and teams competing they have no purpose. So it's in their own interests and benefit to protect those teams and players who are performing the the tournaments and leagues they showcase

Likewise without boxers, governing bodies and doping agencies serve no purpose, they have no tournaments to arrange, no athletes to test and no megastars to bring in audiences.

Everyone loses.

The amount invested in each boxer from sponsors. promotion, camps, trainers, nutritionists, sports scientists on his team as well as contractual agreement in place with managers and promoters who all take their slice out of the pie, all factors into their overall value to of the athletes.

Their career's rest in the hands of these governing bodies and doping agencies

That is why when Dillian was a nobody and didn't have powerhouses such as Matchroom behind him, he was dispensable, since he had no value.

And that is why Joshua was given an exception to take steroids through a TUE, due to his value to what he brings to the sport overall.

And you can be sure if in the unlikely event that Whyte recieves a ban, it will be a slap on the wrist in comparision to the 8 year ban he should be recieving.

Since it's taken so long I am quite certain they are looking for all sorts of loopholes so he can get back in the ring ASAP.

 

You really are an idiot. That is the ENTIRE body of NADP.
If you actually looked at the procedure of tribunals/hearings, you will see that it's a panel of 3, sometimes 1 and in other cases it will be either the president or vice president.

But I'm sure you fully researched that rather than Google 'what is the NADP' then copy and paste.

EDIT: Infact about 3 question down from what you COPIED AND PASTED, is an explanation of the procdure haha.

But again im sure you fully reserached that.

 

Aydamn is in here trying to convince people that this is like a supreme court hearing!

 

And where is your link to tribunals/ hearings being 3 people? I'm waiting.

 

Somebody fully researched like yourself shouldn't need links! Just look into that big empty head of yours, im sure youll find it.

 

I think you're missing my point, I'm not implying anyone has been paid off, rather the people who hand out the bans might not be objective when deciding the length of a ban when taking into account the fighters worth.

Look up the recent Nate Diaz case in the UFC, very similar in some ways, but two very different outcomes...

 

Sure' I''ll just look in my head and imagine how an agency runs carries out its business

If it's worked for you...

 

Yeah but my point is specifically about UKAD and Whyte, I mean we have to look at the cards on the table right? Every scandal in history is different... yes it is a scandal... but they mechansims and circumstances, especially the motivation... is always different.

Diaz and USADA are different organisations, I don't think USADA have an independent panel like UKAD and NADP. They handle results differently.

So I am just speaking about Whyte, how UKAD handle results, how many people involved, and how much money can be used for bribes, and then the risks involved for every person if caught with bribes.

Whyte isn't a megastar, he has made a nice buck... before tax and expenses

 

Aydamn, you are the one who started throwing insults talking about research and calling me a liar. Once again it looks like its you projecting onto other people. You talk yourself up as all knowing, but all you are is a 1st page google copy and paste. Its cool, i understand your insecurities of being wrong on a forum, you have already alluded to that in a previous post.

You can argue your opinion all you want, fair enough, but dont throw insults around about 'liars' and 'research' when you dont even know yourself.

 

My friend I appreciate this must be annoying for you as a Whyte fan, but seriously - if what anonymous posters think about Whyte's PED issues bother you this much - you need to get out more.

 

You are right Furious.

I’ll be taking annual leave to calm down a bit and see life beyond the forum.

I won’t be commenting on anything Whyte related for one month and you can hold me to it.

 

Keep fighting his corner mate - nothing wrong with different opinions and it is a boxthing forum.

 

I think having different opinions is fine, I just think you should reign it in a bit. You don't gain anything from it on here as people will always have their views.