Devin Miles Haney vs. Alfredo Santiago Alvarez & Billy Joe Saunders vs. Marcelo Esteban Cóceres RBR.

I would go re-watch it but I feel like these kinds of fights are only good live because of the tension. Once you know the results, the boxing is atrocious.

 

Well it’s a good debate on a close fight lad? Thought thats what these forums thrived on.

And you’re a moderator!

Ohwell. At least I could take your cheeseman comment on the chin

 

Log off and get a sleep then rather than talk about YouTubers boxing

 

Very true and Haney is blazing away fighting guys who are 12-0 (4) in his first defence.

Loma must be terrified.

 

1 point for holding head down and uppercutting him and 1 point for hitting a downed opponent. He didn't go down til after the illegal uppercut so even the knockdown could be called into question.

 

after looking at replay, the ref was spot on. ksi got hit with a peach of an upper, but he was still rigid, then that next upper while holding the head, which is an illegal blow, took his legs, then the next one after his knees were down, was also a foul. 2 points is a judgement call, but justifiable.

 

Barry and Susan Hearn are noted in the book, Eddie isn't...

Why lie?

 

I want Lomachenko-Haney. I think Loma would win, but it might not be easy for him.

Haney is faster, taller, longer, naturally bigger, and actually has more fights than Loma, but Loma is more skilled and has more experience against top fighters.

 

Yes and ANYONE who has fought professionally would or a true academic of the game would realise this.

He was very very lucky not to be Dqd. I don’t hear any complaints about that Batista guy getting dqd by throwing a lazy jab after the bell

 

I can't find anything which says it was a list of visitors. It was simply an address book with thousands of names and numbers in. You don't need to meet someone to get their name and number, and even if Epstein did meet them it doesn't mean it was at Epstein's place. Also, it was only Barry Hearn's name in the book, not Eddie's.

 

Epstein had the personal address and telephone number for the Hearn's family. That should raise red flags for anybody.

Let me ask you, do you have personal mobile phone numbers and address of people you don't know?

I don't! I only have phone numbers and addresses of people who I've visited and met in the past as it is with most.

It sounds if you want to brush this under the carpet due to being star struck by the Hearn's celebrity status. This is why one of the many ways these people are able to get away with these kind of crimes, since the public look at these public figures and believe they're not capable of being involved in such activity.

The argument you're proposing to excuse your hero, is the same rhetoric used to defend Prince Andrew and the rest of his cronies who were all lining up to visit Epstein Island.

As for Eddie's name not being in the book, there are murmers going around online that he was involved in visiting that place. Since both his father and mother frequented there, even if he did not visit he must have been aware of his father's activity which is just as bad.

The very least we can agree, is that they should be investigated