I dont know where this stuggled to beat Huck myth is coming from? Huck kept the fight competitive throughout but I had Povetkin comfortably up on points.
Right Povetkin won a majority decision. So you having Alexander up comfortably means what? That is your opinion. Also you know Huck is a cruiser weight who up until that point never had a heavyweight bout? Alexander still struggled.
Right because you say so. I can make any silly statement I want. Butterbean would of destroyed Lennox Lewis. It doesn't make it so. Michael Hunter lost one fight in his career and he wasn't destroyed in that fight either. Huck on the other hand was knocked out by light punching cruiser weight Steve Cunnigham.
You mean Alexander Povetkin beat a 37 year old faded Chris Byrd? Yeah because that is something to brag about right? I will assume by your comments you are some biased European boxing fan. So I can't take anything you type seriously. Alexander Povetkin best wins before he faced Wladimir and then roided on steroid was against a 37 year old Byrd and a 40 year old Larry Donald. Hell Povetkin was probably on steroids for those fights too. He just started using more after Wladimir rag doll him around the ring. On that note I will ignore anything else you type.
He fought Donald, Byrd and Chambers as his 12, 13 and 14ths fights. I'm guessing that you're the alt of one of the idiots that keeps getting banned here for being an idiot.
Again what is your point kid? That was Huck's first fight at heavyweight. Povetkin still struggled. Just because you thought he didn't proves nothing. But if you want to use that the only reason Povetkin because Eddie Chambers was because Eddie Chambers was a American fighting in Europe. As I stated Povetkin threw 929 punches landed only 201 compared to Chambers throwing 398 and landed 198 yet one judge had Povektin winning 10 rounds. This also has nothing to do with Povetkin being past his prime had to get on steroids to become better.