Which heavyweights at the age of 34 were better than Wilder is now?

Carl Williams would not have gone 10 rounds with Wilder.

 

Both Rahman and McCall have a win that Wilder will never duplicate

 

Ortiz would not have been outboxed by Bruno and Fury was out of shape against Wallin, also Rahman and McCall never had to face a 6'4 southpaw either.

 

Lewis was wide open and out of sorts v McCall, he improved drastically after that.

 

This content is protected

 

The entire point of me posting their names is that they beat Lewis despite being fairly average contenders. This may have been lost on you.

 

And STILL... Wilder will never have a win that matches Get over it scrub..

 

Yeah...I'm still waiting for Wilder to improve. Go figure...

 

Lol @ the hate in this thread. Everyone's acting as if they have a super long list and then they go name the same 4 or 5 all time greats that were better at 34. No povetkin was never that good, just another guy who never won a title. Ray mercer? Come on now. If you were not born in the 80s or before and you are saying Ray mercer was better than Wilder at 34 you sound like a dip ****

 

No son, some of us were actually watching boxing back then. You've seen what... Mercer on youtube?

 

Actually the fight said more about Lewis than Mercer

 

Oh sorry, but my comment is still a valid point, but yes they were more than average, they were poor.

 

I watched Mercer back then and the British commentators didn`t think he was that good and neither did the ring magazine that slated his sloppy start v Morrison and his limited display v an ageing Holmes.

 

Vitali moved his head as much as Brezeale , Wilder would kill him.

 

Oh really, so Rahman never fought Sanders then