Anthony Joshua vs Archie Moore

I favor Joshua over 12 and think it's a 50/50 fight over 15

 

Oh lord.

 

The forum has hit a new low.

Why the moderators allow these threads is a mystery.

 

It is because they, unfortunately, attract the most traffic.

 

What’s wrong with it? Moore has beaten men of Ajs size and actually has a lot more wins over ranked opponents.

 

I've got AJ winning. By ko in 9 but been behind on the cards at the time.

 

My bad, I haven't taken into consideration that Archie was a Marciano opponent which automatically increases his chances by a significant factor purely by default.

 

No, he was a top contender for a numerous amount of years and has a deep resume at heavyweight and light heavyweight, as well as looking sharp with great defense on film which allows him to be competitive with Joshua

 

Archie is arguably a top ten p4p guy. Marciano opponent or not. Think you may have an obsession along with some others with the man if all you consider him is a Marciano opponent.

 

Archie is a top p4p talent, that i do not dispute, however, there is no way in hell he is beating Joshua.

As for my other comment regarding being a Marciano opponent, sorry but that stands.
Time & time again we see any opponent of his becoming sided with in ridiculous matches in an attempt to raise his standing.

 

Being a top ten p4p doesn't mean you are necessarily beating a heavyweight!

 

Joshua put on a boxing exhibition losing possibly 1/2 rounds.
He fought exactly the right fight against a shorter, short armed swarmer,not giving his height and reach away as he did in the first fight.
A big guy, nearly17 stone boxed on the move ,behind the jab for 12 rds .
Some people!
Ruiz might just walk right through Moore! If he can take Joshua's punches Moore ain't doing jack **** to him!

 

He wasn't a top contender at heavy weight for a numerous amount of years.

 

OFFS!
At 19 he was giving Holyfield all he could handle you are talking rubbish!