Why won't the WBC make Wilder/Whyte?

I'm not sure what you're trying to address. My post did not address any of what you are talking about, so I'm confused.

 

And what has that got to do with anything? Whyte shouldn’t get his title shot because you think he’d get beat easy? He’s been mandatory for over 2 ****ing years. And regardless of what you think of the doping thing, and I have my own opinion on that, he’s been cleared.

 

More like Americans have not had a HW champ in decades since Europe have pretty much dominated and owned the belts for decades and they will do anything to manipulate things. Sooner or later Wilder will be smashed to bits and the belts back to Europe/UK

 

Amongst other reasons, the WBC prob feel Whyte along with his current behaviour and past discretions, would be a terrible ambassador for their once converted belt

 

Yet you fail to note that you started it by calling me a moron, even though you cant work it out.
I will skip alot of the breaking down alot of this thread and go right to the end to give you a more simple breakdown, so as not to see you struggle any longer

OK lets get it into your head what has happened here.

I said I have been a bit critical of the Ring ratings for various reasons, and I sited the fact that Joshua had beaten 4 of the other fighters in their top 10 and as you pointed out, using it that you could put that argument that Joshua could be rated higher, yet the Ring doesnt rate Joshua higher.
Now work that out and tell me how I have been hypocritical?

The ring have Wilder at 2 based on one win over one of their rated fighters and the same publication that I am critical of rate a fighter with 4 wins over their rated fighters at 3.
The fighter who at 3, yes did lose a fight in his 23rd fight but who also has beaten more of their top 10 HWs than their #1 and #2 combined and done that in a short amount of time, as well as unifing

So you site longevity for Wilder, but that is based on a fortunate decision to many as had Fury been given the win, their wouldnt be longevity that you quote, yet your answer is they are having a rematch, basically saying so it doesnt count lol

Yes that is hypocrisy you are looking at there, but not from me

Look again, or if you realy get stuck, try and do what you did on the last post you made to me and try and call in another poster for support. You seem like you need it

 

What's the situation after the potential Fury/Wilder fight if Fury wins?

Fury vs Wilder 3 ?

 

WBC pulls a lot of bull**** with mandatories.

They did the same with Stevenson.

 

I know It’s hard for you to keep track of your own posts, but check out your second response to me.

Let me dumb it down for you: “Ring rankings shouldn’t count, they have nationalistic bias.” In the very next post: Joshua has the better resume, he beat more Ring rated fighters” That’s basically what you said in a passive-agressive manner, that’s how you were being an hypocrite.

No, the Ring don’t have Wilder at #2, they have him there for having 10 straight title defences and having beaten 2 ranked contenders. (One top10, one top15), and they have Joshua below for the reason I explained, same goes for TBRB who have Wilder at #1 and Joshua at #3. I thought Fury beat Wilder in their first fight too, but I also thought Chisora beat Whyte in their first fight. But It doesn’t matter what I or you think, the fact is Whyte is 2-0 over Chisora and Wilder has 10 title defences. That’s how It’ll go down in the records.

And I only mentioned a poster who doesn’t even post here any more. You can reach all you want to pethaticly try to claim a moral victory.

 

No, I would rather see Wilder-Joshua, but if not that then I think Whyte deserves his shot.

 

Whyte would get destroyed who wants too see that fight?

 

Are you saying Ortiz is not a hard puncher? Whyte got caught cheating and should not even get a title shot. Besides Wilder would murder Whyte anyway. Hearns is trying to use Whyte so he can avoid His glass jawed money maker Joshua from Wilder. Joshua does not have the chin to take Wilder's punch. Joshua can run from a fat guy but he will get hit by Wilder at some point and it will be over. WIlder and Fury are the top heavyweights right now and if Fury had punching power he would have stopped Wilder. Don't get me wrong Wilder also has a weak chin but he knows how to hold on when he is in trouble unlike Joshua.

 

I offer my sincere apologies, I quoted the wrong person.

 

The only notable opponent Ortiz has KOed or stopped is Jenning almost 5 years. So mo Ortiz is up there with hardest punchers in the divison.

Whyte was cleared from any wrong doing. If the WBC had any decency they would install him back as the mandatory and enfirce by next summer at the latest.

AJ doesnt have chin to take Wilders punch? Wilder has avoided hard punchers his entire career because he was knocked out by Romanov at Amateurs and dropped by extremely low level journmen in Nichols and Sconiers.

Wilder has a harder over hand and straight right than AJ but AJ is better than Wilder in every other way.

- -AJ has much better variation of punches
- AJ is a much better combination puncher.
- AJ has better and quicker foot movement, .
- AJ is better at judging and controlling the distance.
- AJ is much better overall defensively
- AJ is a more accurate puncher
- AJ has a better jab
- AJ has a better uppercut
- AJ has a better hook
- AJ has superior ring IQ

Also a massive difference in quality of resumes (AJ has beaten 5 opponents better than Wilder best opponent in Ortiz) as AJ has been fighting against a much higher standard than Wilder

 

Yeah he’s tough on YouTube if only there was a was to settle all this...oh yeah he passed on that to fight Chisora. Internet tough guys are the worst.

 

If 15 Million dollars aint enough to convince wilder to "Settle it" guess what... Wilder doesnt want to "Settle it"

Many guys on here including you, would shag another man for 15 Million Dollars.

It's shame Wilder doesnt want to carry out his chosen career role by fighting Whyte for that money, and not having to shag another man.