Fight of the Week #29: The Year was 1982...

nah I wasn’t calling you on it. I did the same thing in round 9, after seeing my error I checked the other cards. No biggie just want to be as accurate as possible. When I tabulate 5-8 cards I frequently make mistakes and just wanted to minimize them

 

Well the judge scorecards, this week or month or fortnight? Whatever it is? Don’t really matter as not one fight went to the cards but here goes anyway:

Arguello vs Pryor I consensus:
1 Pryor 4-0
2 Pryor 3-1 (George the lone dissenter)
3 Even 2-2
4 Pryor 3-0-1 (Jel the lone dissenter)
5 Arguello 3-1 (Philly the lone dissenter)
6 Pryor 4-0
7 Pryor 3-1 (Jel the lone dissenter)
8 Arguello 3-1 (George the lone dissenter)
9 Arguello 3-1 (George the lone dissenter)
10 Pryor 4-0
11 Arguello 4-0
12 Pryor 4-0
13 Arguello 3-1 (Jel the lone dissenter)

the consensus verdict is 125-123 or 7-5-1 in favor of Pryor at TOS

Thanks to all who scored:

Pryor cards:
@George Crowcroft 126-121
@rorschach51 124-123
@PhillyPhan69 125-122
@Jel 125-123

we saw 1-6-10-11-12 the same with 4 going to Pryor and 1 to Arguello
Making for 8 swing rounds with at least 1 dissenter.
George and Jel disagreed with the consensus in 3 separate rounds
Philly disagreed with the consensus in 1 round
Rorschach held the consensus line in every round

 

Mancini vs Kim consensus among 5 judges

1 Kim 5-0
2 Mancini 4-1 (George disagrees with the majority)
3 Mancini 3-2 (George/Rorschach disagree)
4 Kim 4-1 (Rorschach disagrees)
5 Mancini 5-0
6 Mancini 2-1-2 (none of us agree lol)
7 Mancini 3-2 (Philly/Rorschach disagree)
8 kim 4-1 (George disagrees)
9 Kim 5-0
10 Mancini (10-8)/9-9) 4-1 (George disagrees)
11 Mancini 5-0
12 Mancini 5-0
13 Mancini 4-1 (rough disagrees)

consensus Mancini up 126-120 at TOS

kim cards- none

draw card
@George Crowcroft 123-123

Mancini cards
@rorschach51 125-121
@PhillyPhan69 125-121
@roughdiamond 125-122
@Jel 126-121

we had 5 rounds in agreement 1-5-9-11-12 for a 4-1 Mancini edge.
Round 6 where we all saw it different (2-1-2)
And 7 disagreeable rounds
George disagreed with the consensus in 4 rounds
Rorschach disagreed with the consensus in 3 rounds
Philly/rough disagrees with the consensus in 1 round
Jel held the consensus line apart from round 6 where we were very divided!

thanks to all who scored the fight!

 

Gomez vs Pintor consensus 4 judges

1 Gomez 4-0
2 Gomez 3-1 (George disagreed)
3 Pintor 4-0
4 Gomez 3-1 (Jel disagreed)
5 Pintor 3-1 (George disagreed)
6 Even (10-9 Pintor w/deduction) (2 Pintor 10-8—2 Gomez 9-9)
7 Gomez 2-1-1 (George/Jel disagree)
8 Gomez 4-0
9 Gomez 3-1 (Philly disagreed)
10 Pintor 2-1-1 (Rorschach/Jel disagree)
11 Gomez 4-0
12 Pintor 3-1 (Jel disagreed)
13 Pintor 4-0

124-122 by consensus at TOS

5 rounds the same Gomez up 3-2 (1-3-8-11-13)
1 even round
7 swing rounds
George/Jel disagreed 4 times
Rorschach/Philly disagreed 1 time

Gomez cards
@rorschach51 124-121
@PhillyPhan69 123-122
@George Crowcroft 123-122
@Jel 124-123

thanks to all who participated

 

Navarrete vs Choi consensus 5 judges

1 Choi 5-0
2 Navarrete 5-0
3 Choi 3-2 (George/Butt disagree)
4 Choi 5-0
5 Choi (10-8) 5-0
6 Choi 3-2 (George/Butt disagree)
7 Navarrete 5-0
8 Choi 3-1-1 (Rorschach/Jel disagree)
9 Navarrete 4-1 (George disagreed)
10 Navarrete 5-0
Navarrete down 95-93 at TOS

We had 6 unanimous rounds (1-2-4-5-7-10)
And 4 swing rounds
George disagreed 4 times with the consensus
Intentional butt disagreed twice
Rorschach/Jel disagreed once
Philly held the consensus line

Navarrete cards
@IntentionalButt 95-93

Draw cards
@George Crowcroft 94-94
@Jel 94-94

Choi cards
@PhillyPhan69 95-93
@rorschach51 95-94

thanks to all who scored this one

 

Sanchez vs Nelson consensus 5 judges

1 Nelson 4-1 (Jel disagreed)
2 Nelson 2-1-2 (we all disagree)
3 Sanchez 3-1-1 (scar/Rorschach disagree)
4 Nelson 4-1 (Jel disagreed)
5 Nelson 5-0
6 Sanchez 4-1 (Jel disagreed)
7 Sanchez (10-8) 5-0
8 Sanchez 4-1 (Jel disagreed)
9 Sanchez 5-0
10 Nelson 2-1-2 (we all disagreed)
11 Nelson 5-0
12 Nelson 4-1 (ETM disagreed)
13 Nelson 3-0-2 (scar/etm disagree)
14 Sanchez 4-0-1 (Jel disagreed)
Consensus Nelson up 133-132 at TOS

we agreed on 4 rounds 3 for Sanchez 2 for Nelson
3 split rounds 2-1-2 both for Nelson

and 6 swing rounds
Jel disagreed with 5 consensus rounds
Scar/etm disagreed with 2 rounds
Rorschach disagreed with 1 round
Philly held the consensus line apart from the 2 split rounds 2-10

nelson cards
@scartissue 135-133
@rorschach51 133-132

draw cards
@PhillyPhan69 133-133
@Jel 133-133

Sanchez cards
@ETM 136-132

thanks to all who participated

 

Fletcher vs green

1 green 5-0
2 Green 5-0
3 Green 5-0
4 Fletcher 4-1 (Jel disagreed)
5 Even 2-2-1 (we all disagree)
Green 3-1-1 49-47 at TOS

green cards
@Jel 50-45
@ETM 49-46
@rorschach51 49-47
@George Crowcroft 48-47
@PhillyPhan69 48-47

 

Our champions ;-p are
@George Crowcroft
@rorschach51
@PhillyPhan69
@Jel

for competing in EVERY fight!

everyone else gets a participation trophy!

 

Apparently I need to go on some kind of judging course - jesus, how did I manage to disagree on 5 consensus rounds?! That's terrible!

 

Awesome work, Philly!

 

nah, it does not mean that at all...could be they were close rounds...could be you are right and everyone else is wrong...could be a case of choosing body punches over head shots or heavy blows over volume...I have had fun scoring with you over the past year, sometimes we agree sometimes we don’t, I have never looked at one of your cards and though anything...keep on keeping on bro

 

Well, my only consolation (apart from your kind words, of course) is that my overall points tallies were on par. I didn't come up with a horrendously one-sided scorecard so perhaps you can keep the Adalaide Byrd trophy on ice for now...