Who was the better fighter, Jack Johnson or Joe Frazier?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Dec 26, 2019.


  1. Grapefruit

    Grapefruit Active Member Full Member

    1,215
    943
    Dec 19, 2017
    Joe Frazier beats Johnson every round while Johnson tries to clinch and avoid Frazier the best hs can until he gets caught, rocked and dropped mid rounds
     
  2. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,500
    27,036
    Feb 15, 2006
    Johnson is the greater fighter, with the better resume.

    Frazier would have won head to head, for stylistic reasons.
     
  3. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,428
    9,392
    Oct 22, 2015
    Frazier was a much better fighter and prime vs prime he would destroy "The Galvaston Giant" Who would be only an inch or two taller than Frazier and would weigh roughly about the same. Boxing and boxers had progressed significantly between Frazier and Johnson's era's.
     
  4. Mendoza

    Mendoza Hrgovic = Next Heavyweight champion of the world. banned Full Member

    55,255
    10,344
    Jun 29, 2007
    Agreed. Can’t see Frazier ko’d by a super middle, out boxed by another, and floored dazed by a third super middle.

    Matching Frazier vs. sub 175 pound men would be like throwing a fluffy white kitten over a fence into a mean junk yard dog’s domain.

    Frazier is the better fighter and would win head to head.
     
  5. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,885
    45,001
    Feb 11, 2005
    I call BS on this... at least as far as heavyweight resume.

    Please to list me Johnson's top 5 heavyweight pelts.
     
  6. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,879
    18,813
    Oct 4, 2016

    Frazier would make this a war of attrition , I think Jack would do a lot of good things and Frazier would get wounded but in the end I'll go with Joe
     
  7. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,500
    27,036
    Feb 15, 2006
    Another way to look at the question, would be to ask what Frazier's best twenty were!
     
    Richard M Murrieta likes this.
  8. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,558
    May 4, 2017
    Yes, head to head.
     
  9. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,558
    May 4, 2017
    There`s no Ali on Johnson`s resume.
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,885
    45,001
    Feb 11, 2005
    I think that Ron Stander would fit in comfortably in Jack's top 20.
     
  11. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,500
    27,036
    Feb 15, 2006
    Johnson was beating contenders regularly from 1902 to 1915 or thereabouts.

    I think it is far to say that he has got it sewn up on depth and longevity here!
     
  12. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,601
    28,857
    Jun 2, 2006
    I think most here would.
     
  13. ETM

    ETM I thought I did enough to win. Full Member

    13,218
    11,528
    Mar 19, 2012
    Certainly longevity.
     
  14. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,601
    28,857
    Jun 2, 2006
    No there isn't ,but there is,Langford,Jeannette ,McVey,Childs,Martin,Burns,Moran,Gardner,Fitzsimmons,Jeffries.
     
  15. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,885
    45,001
    Feb 11, 2005
    Oh, some novice fighters, a light-middleweight, some lightheavies and an old alfalfa farmer.