Who´d make 49 - 0 in the 50s ?

Why not?

 

His knee's were gone after 32 fights anyway.

 

Who beats him?
Which opponent of Marciano's would you make favourite over him?
Which opponent of Rocky's would you confidently expect to go the distance with Tyson?
The only way Tyson loses against any of those 49 is if he pulls a Tokyo, and starts banging ***** instead of training.

 

Marciano fought 10 guys 185lbs or under, and 2 more within half a pound of it.He also fought another 8 ,175lbs or under.

 

Maybe you should check archies record and the big men he beat. He is not short there. Spinks beat an out of prime Holmes (very close fights) and beat a very rusty Cooney. Still very good wins and a good fighter. But besides those not much there. Hide? Yes Hide lost to some bigs but he wasn’t on the level of Walcott Charles Moore. Hide really doesn’t have a lot of quality wins.

 

He had knee problems before the heavyweights. If he was fighting at heavyweight, even back then, he would have been coming in heavier than he was throughout his light heavyweight career.

8 years, but with more fights crammed in fighting at a heavier weight against heavier opponents. I think the knee's would factor. Spinks chin was suspect at Heavyweight and he would have had some dangerous times. Holmes was well past his best but when he trained properly for that second fight he went a lot better. Never an overly big hitter he hurt Spinks plenty of times across their bouts with right hands that lacked the snap and timing they had just a few short years prior.

 

I read it was running in heavy boots that did it.

 

When did I mention Marciano? Are you forgetting what trolling you’re doing on which page? Stay focused. The question is wether or not these men could replicate the feat. The answer is no. Also Archie has the most underrated HW resume maybe ever. Also because someone beats one fighter it doesn’t mean they will beat another. Styles are important.

 

Cooney was shyte and didn't even hit him hard and clean. Holmes was very tired and tho he ramped it up in the rematch he was still struggling. He'd lost a lot of snap and timing and tired more than he previously had. I'm not even sure he was that much better than he was later against Mercer. He seemed to have a bit of freshness and tho Mercer was straight forward Holmes looked pretty good. If a tired Holmes hurt him a Walcott or Moore certainly might. Again i really don't think his knee's would see him thru it all anyway.