Peak Golovkin vs Peak Canelo

GGG would have to "dog out" Canelo because Canelo is always going to out skill GGG.

 

I don't see why he should be banned? There is a troll who is getting personal with other people kids and has nothing to do with boxing? mods here need to do there job, but since he's a ggg lover it will be hard for him to be banned from here.

 

It really doesn't matter if the fight is in Vegas

 

Why not? Does GGG have Vegas problems?

 

No one beats the money man in Vegas, just the way it is. That is of course unless the money man's promoter either is looking to cashout the star & make another, or set up a money making trilogy.

 

Hes on the peak ggg vs Canelo thread

 

That is my 7 year old son, only reason I put that picture here was because he asked me to, he loves boxing and he's in boxing, I showed him this site and told me why did I had a picture of another boxer and not one with them lol now I see that was probably a bad idea since there are some sick mofos in here especially when confusing a kid with a adult

 

I think the unbiased opinion would be Golovkin wins easily. There’s a chance he wins via stoppage, but most likely a wide UD.

Don’t really care how you scored either fight. Canelo now, yesteryear, or ever.... gets beat by prime GGG. Granite chin, heavy fists, superb footwork, with elite timing and reflexes. Canelo can’t touch that at 160.

 

Don’t you mean what would have happened if canelo wouldn’t have binned his title rather than face a prime ggg. Only one winner because don’t forget a past it ggg went 24 rounds with a supposed great elite canelo and matched him punch for punch . We all know who would have won if it had happened 4 years earlier ..

 

I think your numbers are out here chief. You're also failing to take into account that a significant percentage of very active posters on here schlurp down cinnamon flavoured Kool-aid like their lives depend on it.

 

Here's something for the delusional ones to think about.

In GGG's prime, he was avoided and feared. There is enough evidence of this from active fighter comments (Saunders), Eubank's father pulling his son out, the story of Barker's manager refusing to put his guy in etc. The fear was real and justified. Macklin had his ribs broken, Brook was socketed, many were bashed up.

Canelo has never been avoided by anybody around middleweight, nobody is actually scared of him. Everybody jumps at the fight. It's not just because of the bigger pay day, even though it's a variable. If Canelo was as dangerous as GGG(who provided relatively big paydays for opponents) contenders/champs would be more hesistant, particularly because of the dodgy clauses. Fighters know bad KO's can ruin them. Canelo may get a little more fear after the Kovalev debacle, but so far, no.

Let's simplify it. Froch could have had another fight for big money. GGG was on the table and he turned it down. Do people really think he would have turned down Canelo for the same money, right after KO'ing Groves? That's hard to believe. Froch would have taken the Canelo fight with no fear and likely battered him. He wasn't quite so sure about doing that to Golovkin, though.