Your Top Ten All TIme Euro Middles?

I had to get a little bit more info about the French fighters.
Knew a bit about them but not in depth.

 

Fitz
Dempsey
Turpin
Benvenuti
Sturm
Graham
Collins
Eubank
Benn
Papp
No particular order.

 

He went to New Zealand as a 10 year old from England and lived in a Cornsih community in New Zealand, learned his boxing trade in New Zealand, he was a grown man before he went to Australia.
He is considered an Englishman in winning the world championship in these so called history books, you also forgot Peter Maher and Tom Sharkey both heavyweight world champions pre-dating Max Schmeling.

I'm not getting into any more geography lessons, I'm actually trying to make my middleweight list.

 

I wonder how many years of practice it took you to become so adept at spewing utter garbage, at will. It's as though it is your second nature - or, just... ...your nature.

You carry a double standard. This is a proven fact. I have not taken anything out of context, as the evidence shows. It needed little consideration, because it really is not that complicated. Perhaps, it is you who should more carefully consider the matters of method that you might genuinely want to defend, before taking opposite positions on the same point, from one post to the next. As it is, you just spout aggressive trash, without much thought at all.

I think you must just like being miserable and 'shouty' with people, who disagree with you (which I am going to take a guess at amounting to a good few posters on these boards).

In this case, you immediately set out to claim a conspiracy; that the criteria stated by the OP, has been set "just to exclude Abraham and Gevor." Then, you claim "disciples" (what planet?) have ruined this thread, when it is you who has refused to abide by the criteria, arguing the toss over junior geography, in your typical, 'House of Pain Charm School' kind of way.

I'm not sure there is anything to be gained in discussing your lack of comprehension, when it comes to a simple, given criterion. And, what is there to refute, when your list contains Boxers, who do not fit the criteria specified; done so willfully, as if to take a stand (against an imagined injustice - how strange)?


And - by the way - I posted my top-10, on the first page of the thread, you cretin.

 

I notice there’s no problem with your prose in this post.
You’ve slipped up again.
You’re a WUM.

 

Goodbye Troll, (aka Ra's Al-Ghul)...

 

Thought you were going to say you were ringside for Langford v Hague for a second there Mac !!!

 

France is in Europe.

 

Benn and Eubank didn`t achieve much at 160, the WBO belt wasn`t as established as the major three belts back then, McCallum was the WBA champ and Eubank ducked him, Mike looked far better v Watson than Eubank and Benn did, Benn was completely outclassed v Watson, he looked better v Barkley but that was just a war and Eubank exposed Benn at 160, Nigel was far better in the rematch at 168.