Better resume SRL or Pac?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by surfinghb1, Feb 6, 2020.


Better Resume

  1. SRL

    62.0%
  2. PAC

    38.0%
  1. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Great post.

    Everyone's circumstances are different.

    Nobody knows how Ray would have reacted had his have been different to what we saw.

    Manny's longevity has been incredible and he deserves huge respect for that.
     
    PernellSweetPea likes this.
  2. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Context please.

    Manny is truly great. But there was nothing basic about Ray's career.

    Comparing beating Marvin to beating guys like Hatton is ridiculous.

    Was Marvin faded? Of course. But wasn't Ray also faded?

    He hadn't fought for over 3 years.

    He'd never fought at MW before.

    Manny had great longevity that deserves huge respect. But we don't know how he'd have reacted to facing a great fighter after a 3 year lay off, even if that great was faded,

    Of course Ray would have failed fighting across a similar number of weight classes. But his circumstances were completely different. He never had the opportunity to do what Manny did. His 4th weight class would have been LHW.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  3. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,765
    17,825
    Apr 3, 2012
    Ray abused himself and didn’t need to be out for three years. That’s why he was past it for Hagler. Manny deserves respect for the discipline he has, which Leonard lacked.

    Hatton is probably top 5 all time at 140 and Pac destroyed him. Pac didn’t nick a close disputed decision by shoeshining and running.
     
  4. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    You're hopeless.
     
    Flash24 and George Crowcroft like this.
  5. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft He Who Saw The Deep Full Member

    27,133
    44,920
    Mar 3, 2019
    :risas3::risas3::risas3:
     
  6. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,765
    17,825
    Apr 3, 2012
    Your feelings
     
  7. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,718
    352
    Jul 12, 2007
    No way is Hatton top five.
     
  8. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    He's just a time waster.

    He never applies context to anything.

    How can you compare fighting Ricky Hatton at LWW, to Ray moving up to MW for the first time, to fight Marvin Hagler after a 3 year off?

    He thinks that the win over Hatton was more impressive because of the knockout, without taking into account the calibre of the fighters etc.

    The guy's a joker.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  9. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,765
    17,825
    Apr 3, 2012
    140 is a new division. The top 5 probably includes Chavez, Zoo, Cervantes, and Benitez.

    The 5 spot could go to Pryor (PED's), Crawford, Bradley, or Hatton.

    Hatton is top ten there and has a nice case for top 5.
     
  10. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,765
    17,825
    Apr 3, 2012
    Ok, so if you sit out shoving blow up your nose and scrap out an undeserved decision over a fading great champion it's infinitely better than moving up to ko a basically prime champion who may be hof bound.
     
  11. Mod-Mania

    Mod-Mania Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,708
    2,889
    Aug 12, 2012
    Chavez, Pryor, Cervantes, Locche and Tszyu are better than Hatton at 140 for starters.
     
  12. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Oh my.
     
  13. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    You're looking at the circumstances.

    The degree of difficulty.

    The calibre of the fighters in question.

    Ray beating Hagler was much more of an accomplishment than Manny beating Hatton.

    This shouldn't need explaining to you.
     
  14. surfinghb1

    surfinghb1 Member Full Member

    477
    847
    Jul 28, 2019

    You are definitely leaving out Napoles at 140 and McFarland too( if the division was there when he was fighting but his best weight was that) … I agree with you on your take with Ray .. He used his popularity to go in and out of the sport …How was Ray totally faded? Yes he had a long layoff but he had WAY less wear and tear and half the fights than Marvin had.. It's not so much the age as the Activity and punishment the body takes. And he was 2 years younger than Marvin.. He moved great in that fight and out boxed Mrvin clearly from the outside first half of the fight … Faded? hardly … more like preserved for me with the minimal fights he had compared to Marv especially after the punishment Hags just went thru…..
     
  15. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,765
    17,825
    Apr 3, 2012
    I disagree about Locche. Hatton beat Zoo, Urango, Castillo Lazcano, Phillips, and Paulie. He also unified against Maussa which should've been Vivian if Vivian didn't blow it. Locche didn't get those kind of wins and would probably get mauled by Hatton who came in the ring heavy.

    Pryor beat an old Cervantes and an aging, wrong weightclass Arguello with the use of PED's. Hatton can easily be argued ahead of Pryor.