Better resume SRL or Pac?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by surfinghb1, Feb 6, 2020.


Better Resume

  1. SRL

    62.0%
  2. PAC

    38.0%
  1. surfinghb1

    surfinghb1 Member Full Member

    477
    847
    Jul 28, 2019
    Why is everyone LEAVING out Napoles???
     
  2. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,762
    17,820
    Apr 3, 2012
    I'm obviously not talking about guys who were around before the division was made.

    Like I said earlier, Pacquaio was more than capable of jumping to 140 or 147 and nicking a decision off a faded great champion. He just nicked one off a faded Thurman at age 40. But there was no chance in hell of Leonard sticking around for 20-25 years and taking legitimate belts in as many weightclasses as Pac.
     
    surfinghb1 likes this.
  3. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,762
    17,820
    Apr 3, 2012
    Because he was a welterweight champ
     
  4. surfinghb1

    surfinghb1 Member Full Member

    477
    847
    Jul 28, 2019

    Clearly
     
  5. surfinghb1

    surfinghb1 Member Full Member

    477
    847
    Jul 28, 2019
    Yes I know … But he would clean probably everyone's clock at 140 and he DID fight there
     
  6. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,116
    5,733
    Feb 26, 2009
    Both are legendary and you are right there are different kinds of circumstances and legends. The ones who fight everyone like Manny and then others who make the big scene and fight the great guys by luck in exciting fights like Ray. Both are great. Manny might have one of the best resumes in history. It really has been incredible. Sometimes I think guys should retire where Manny is now. That one extra fight where he is stopped by someone like a Spence does hurt the legacies somewhat, and it is not fair.
     
    Loudon likes this.
  7. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    I never said Ray was totally faded. But yes, he was certainly past his best after 3 years of inactivity and his poor showing against Howard.
     
  8. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    Does Thurman compare to Hagler?

    Again, how could Ray have even have fought in the same amount of weight classes as Manny?

    Engage your brain.
     
  9. surfinghb1

    surfinghb1 Member Full Member

    477
    847
    Jul 28, 2019
    True.. But he hasn't lost to Spence yet and thats what they were sayin' about Thurman … Well at least in General they were .. ha …. It's hard because you can basically pick that one fight on any active ATG's resume and say , he should have stopped right there. But it takes hindsight to do that. For me, Old man Pac is in the time where if he losses, he doesn't hurt his legacy one bit, he has lost before but has already accomplished SO much
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  10. surfinghb1

    surfinghb1 Member Full Member

    477
    847
    Jul 28, 2019
    I agree with that … but comparably he wasn't the faded fighter in the ring that night, the other guy was the one who was Shopworn, not Ray
     
    The Morlocks likes this.
  11. Loudon

    Loudon Loyal Member Full Member

    40,836
    10,233
    Mar 7, 2012
    They were both past their best, but Marvin had many more miles on the clock.
     
    surfinghb1 likes this.
  12. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,718
    352
    Jul 12, 2007
    Cervantes was an aging champion whereas Tszyu and Castillo were in the prime of life, were they?
     
  13. NoNeck

    NoNeck Pugilist Specialist

    26,762
    17,820
    Apr 3, 2012
    Tsyzu was pfp, unified and favored. Cervantes was overcooked by comparison. Destroying Castillo is a nice supporting cast win for a resume.
     
  14. Quick Cash

    Quick Cash Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,718
    352
    Jul 12, 2007
    And that to you means prime?
     
  15. ironchamp

    ironchamp Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,365
    1,033
    Sep 5, 2004
    It's very tempting to say that because Leonard has top tier scalps but when you really think about it Manny has significantly better depth, and with the exception of the Marquez fights, he tends to win more decisively.

    Manny Has:

    Barerra 2X
    Morales 2X
    Marquez 3X
    De la Hoya
    Mosley
    Cotto
    Margarito
    Hatton
    Thurman
    Broner
    Bradley 2X
    Matthyse
    Diaz

    SRL:

    Duran 2X
    Hagler
    Hearns
    Benitez
    Kalule
    Lalonde

    SRL's win over Hagler is not without controversy as was the 3rd installment of Pacquaio vs Marquez. Mosley and De la Hoya were old but Manny was also old when he beat Matthyse, Broner and Thurman.

    Sugar Ray Leonard has one of the flashiest top shelf wins in boxing history, but Manny has so many wins over future HOF fighters/ATG fighters and when you consider how many top tier wins were done in succession:

    Barrera II, Marquez II, Diaz, De la Hoya, Hatton, Cotto, Clottey, Margarito, Mosley, Marquez III (in a 4 year time frame).

    To me it bridges the gap.

    I pick Manny.
     
    DavidBarnes and surfinghb1 like this.