Marciano-I Just Don't Understand It

Goalposts shifting yet again!

 

Okay, in his best result to date, the draw with Fury, he was lighter than Louis was against Marciano.

 

So I said “more often than not”. I should have said “when it counted” and you would be happy with that?

I have edited it to “in his important fights”.

 

That's not what you stated.Marciano fought just one man heavier than Wilder was in his last fight and it only went a round ,so where is this he backed up heavier men than Wilder **** coming from?
Louis was under 205 lbs for the vast majority of his fights. Wilder has only once been as low as 207lbs, in his first fight! DISHONESTY!!!!!

 

Nope I'm never happy with your posts ,you are the most fundamentally dishonest poster on this forum!
We have two halfwits who want to derail every thread, and we have you trying to spin everything and making cynical qualifications to your replies on the hoof.You are the most infuriating poster here and not one person asked where you were or what had happened to you while you were gone ? Though I did get some pms from guys rubbing their hands you were gone.

 

Care to elaborate on this? Or would it be too dishonest to confess?

 

you mean Joe Louis or Lennox Lewis? Lennox was never as low as 205lb in an important fight.

Honestly, Against Tyson Fury, Wilder was 212. He got a draw that night. A whole pound and a half lighter than Joe Louis was against Marciano.

 

It's not about whether or not Marciano can back up Wilder - or the 218 lbs louis weighed against Charles. It's about this statement of yours:
"More often than not Wilder was lighter than the comeback version of Joe Louis that Marciano knocked out."

That is what you said, and it's here for all to see. Everybody knows it's a lie - and yet you call me a "baboons ass" for pointing this out! What is wrong with you?

 

Who says its his best result to date, he only won 4 rounds at most on any objective card.
Now down to one gaol post!

 

Okay, I apologise for not entirely researching exactly how heavy Wilder was “more often than not”. All I knew is that in important fights Wilder has been less than 217. Because he was.

I have edited the post to read “in important fights” he weighed less than comeback Joe Louis.

So whilst it is incorrect to say Wilder was “more often than not” less than 213, I was not deliberately lying, I was simply not entirely correct. And there is a big difference to this! I don’t like to be called a liar.

 

Just as I don't like to be called a baboon's ass!

But ok... no hard feelings.

 

The record.
To date, taking the top heavyweight in the World (right now) to a draw is the best thing on Wilders record. I know you like facts and recorded evidence over opinions. So here it is. The record says it.

 

Once again arguing nonsensical semantics that have nothing to do with the argument. Tall fighters have attempted to lean on Rock it didn’t work. Read the Shkor write up. 6”4 and a half 220 pound Shkor was beat rather soundly. Louis called Marciano incredibly strong if I’m not mistaken. And that’s a man that went against numerous quality shws. The point being does Marciano have problems with 200 pound plus opponents? The answer is an emphatic No. 11-0 11kos. Plenty more that were around 195. How many men did he have to knock out? 20?30? I don’t understand the argument presented here. There is no proof that he wouldn’t pressure Wilder or any other taller fighter with success. Some men are better able to use their height and pose more problems but a man like wilder with no boxing skills posses less a threat then say a Lewis. There is nothing stopping Marciano from getting inside and ending it. Use the constant height statements meanwhile Tyson and Frazier are the same height and no one would dare accuse them of being to small. If gaining weight is the only factor here your arguments have no leg to stand on.

 

Can you stop with this phoney tactic that has been EXPOSED already. I am not a liar. There is no basis for saying that I am dishonest. I entirely object to this unfounded accusation.

If you were half as good at proving dishonesties as you are at finding an incorrect calf measurement I could understand it.. but enough of this BS tactic.

 

What's wrong with him is he is incapable of debating without deliberately altering/qualifying his position as events demand!