Wilder was not exposed against Fury, here`s why

Perhaps the poster's first language isn't English. I understood it alright and agree very much with the technical points made.

 

Ali was in his mid 30's when he was fighting every 3 months.

 

Ali was well into his thirties when he was fighting four times a year. George Foreman had five fights in 1987 and nine fights in 1988 and he was even older. Three months is more than enough time to recover from non serious leg injury and Ortiz didn't even really tax Wilder's legs like Fury did

Stop making excuses for Wilder. He's just weak

 

I'm certain it's far better than anyone here could manage in Bulgarian. Don't worry about the criticism, you're making good points very clearly.

 

Wilder was overrated , now he’s underrated , but now I am certain about one thing , Fury is massively overrated at the moment.

 

Yep, Fury did what Romanov did years ago.

 

when Wilder fights a guy like Eric Molina who'd been KTFO in 1 by Arreola prior nobody cared (he's just a bum) but when Joshua fights Molina or someone of his level they pack a stadium or pay big $$$ to watch it on tv and it's a great victory for their Bodybuilder Hero!!

 

Foreman was not fighting top level opponents, but tomato cans in those years. Clearly not the same. I also clearly stated that in this era, fighters don't top fighter or champions don't fight more than 2 times a year. It's clear in the old era they were fighting 4 or more times a year. Again, if u read u will see what I said. No excuse giving. I clearly spoke on possible reasons for leg stamina issues. Not why he lost. So stop being quick to respond without reading so u can know what u talking about.

 

Again, I said in this era. Everybody in that era fought 4 or more times. This era top fighters and champs don't fight more than twice a year.

 

You really are a gibbering imbecile, aren't you?

 

Lets all watch Fury smack Wilder the ***** up:

This content is protected

Be sure to mute the audio and listen to this backing song:

This content is protected

 

Clearly u are and want me to be along with u. I don't even expect u to even comprehend what I was saying

 

You're right, I don't comprehend what you're saying because your English is appalling and you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

 

U don't comprehend what I'm saying because u are a blabbering idiot who speaks before he thinks.

 

I don't speak on this forum, I type. I can imagine you speaking as you type, however.