Stats and facts aren't "opinion" chok. You get them wrong time and time again and each time they conveniently fall on your side of the debate. If you don't want to be called a liar time after time then get these simple facts right - every time. Anyone can make a slip up but you do so on a regular basis and as stated they always err on your side. Getting them wrong so often and having them skew to the same side every time will certainly have you labelled a liar and to be frank next to no-one would argue.
Ok then let’s see how we go from here then. And by the way, the particular fact this time was simply that Wilder was less in weight in an important fight than Joe Louis was against Marciano, a truth, just one point. That Louis was lighter in his prime is also true..but that is the fact of it. I don’t think I get these facts wrong “time and time again” the criticism is always “hair splitting with the detail” never refuting the actual point. You can probably trip everyone up if anyone ever bothered to investigate everything they said to the same extent. It’s just a deviation tactic..and the game is up!
We are not off to the best of starts. What you actually said (and Bukkake has quoted it) before the edit was this - More often than not Wilder was lighter than the comeback version of Joe Louis that Marciano knocked out. This is simply not THE TRUTH. Nor is it a fact. Bukkake explained very very clearly why it was not true so we are at a bit of a crossroads here as you haven't told the truth regarding what you initially said. That's about all the friendly advice i have for tonight. Good luck.
This is probably the number one most infuriating thing (still not sure as their are many to chose from) about Choklab. He posts a lot of innacuries which always conveniently help his arguments then when he's called out on it, he'll say it was a simple mistake and attempt to gaslight you into thinking you're paranoid.
It’s no different than everyone else. Being semantically incorrect without ruining the point is not lying. On this very thread nobody but me picked @mcvey up on this clanger: Obviously Lennox Lewis was never 205 in an important fight...but I know what he meant. He meant an entirely different person. When I said more “often than not”, and I even went back and edited it to a more correct “in important fights” even a lunatic would know what I meant. And the claim still stands up!
That's a simple mistake. Very common and understandable. Most importantly, it doesn't fall into his side of the argument (actually quite the opposite). We know he didn't post it to mislead people. You on the other hand post mistakes and glaring innacuries a lot. And I mean A LOT. And every time they just happen to fall on your side of the argument (as JT pointed out). Are we really supposed to believe these are all innocent? Especially knowing ypur track record.
Theres some real delusion in this thread from part time fans who watch highlights on youtube like mcevy and swag who are obsessed with size. Lol Primo Carnera the goat poster tells you how biased he is towards size. Marciano would chew Wilder up and spit him out, a light snack if you like, an easy and comprehensive victory.
I have asked this exact same question to two other people. One runs away and refuses to answer, the other cannot bring himself to admit Marciano could possibly lose. Says it all really.
