Dude, you are really in a world of your own. In 19 rounds of boxing, Wilder won exactly two, and that was when Fury had just lost 150 pounds and kicked a coke habit. When Fury was 90%-100%, Wilder did not win a consecutive ten seconds of the fight. On top of this, some of us have been telling you and yours for literally years that this was going to happen. Really, man, take you head out of the sand.
This is what I’m talking about. First and foremost this whole “won two rounds” is just inaccurate and part of what I’m talking about. There were hardly any definitive rounds in either fight baring the last few rounds of the second fight, full credit to Fury. And the two knockdown rounds in the first fight. I mean you can “give” rounds to whomever you wish, but to act like Fury dominated these two fights is just false bravado and feels like insecurity. I have no issue giving Fury full credit for winning the second fight definitively, he earned it. My head isn’t in the sand, it’s you that seems to have an issue with the facts of the matter.
If you honestly score it each round 1 by 1, fury won 10-2 in the first the second I sway between 6-1 and 7-0
wilder landed a few rights that fury rode, some body jabs then spent the rest of the fight backpedaling, not throwing, getting bullied, knocked down, bleeding from every socket in his head then finally standing in the corner getting his defence penetrated by right hands. he had no legs after round 3, falling about everywhere. It was a terrible showing in a championship fight
And I have no issue giving Fury full credit for his performance. Never once have I detracted from that...
Again you can “give” him whatever you want, it’s your opinion, but to imply there was anything definitive in the overwhelming majority of those rounds is just intellectually dishonest. I’m not saying Wilder won 15 rounds and all this other outlandish stuff that is being thrown around. I’m simply saying the amount of definitive rounds are far less than the implications, and it’s weird behavior that comes across as insecurity to me. Maybe I’m misjudging it, but it’s certainly not fact based.
whats weird and insecure about scoring a fight correctly? most sane people, apart from a bingo punch, see no way for him to win. little time to recover from his beating, little time to make changes, and now we know fury can outbox and knock him out. that’s logic.
Cool...I guess we’ll see. I think he has no better or worse chance than he’s had in either other fight. He can either do the job or not, he has demonstrated that he can hurt Fury, maybe he does maybe he doesn’t, but it’s certainly not a forgone conclusion.
no fight is a forgone conclusion apart from maybe mayweather fights after Oscar. but wilder can only fight one way, seek and detonate the right hand and was easily beat up. He could catch fury, but he did 3 or 4 times in 2 and fury shrugged them off. Fury can box, maul, flick/stiff jab, fight southpaw or orthodox, superb defence. wilder has a much better chance against AJ and Whyte
Tyson Fury was knocked down twice in the first fight. I had that fight for Wilder by one point. All credit for Fury's terrific win over Deontay this last time, a few more of that caliber and he might crack the top 20 ATGs. However, I personally think we'll see Fury ko'd this next time. The first fight's knockdowns were a premonition. All Deontay needs is to listen to his trainers more. What happened this last fight will never happen again. Fury's days are numbered.
Can't be too glass jawed, he held the title for over five years and many defenses. He loses one fight by an early stoppage and suddenly he has a glass jaw?