Whyte/Povetkin official

I find it laughable that in order to stretch for signs that this fight is meaningless that you're reduced to calling Whyte a ducker for ducking fights against opponents he's already fought.

 

Thanks mate.

Here's a special tip for you though, if you take Eddie Hearns soiled Y-Fronts off your face you don't really have to stretch that far for signs that its **** Poor Value for the already hard ridden boxing fans.

Yes make the fight.
No to charging £20/£25.

Oh and Whyte is a serial ducker.

 

You wanna talk about quaks, Wilder ducked Whyte and Povetkin and AJ

Whyte took the Parker fight for no reward.. when Parker was prime young hungry to avenge his AJ loss

Whyte got nothing from the fight he didnt need it

and you say he is chicken?

Fought Rivas for nothing....

Fighting Povetkin for nothing... he could lose his WBC

So keep trolling the whole forum can see what you are doing... chatting BS

 

whats with the apologetics for Parker? He had 12 rounds to do something... why is 12 rounds not enough?

He failed simple really

Chisora failed

Rivas failed

Your predictions failed

If Whyte is so bad why cant Parker beat him easily? Why would a referee make a difference he wasn’t holding parkers punches.. Parker was free to punch at will and that he did!!!

 

Whyte fans disagree with you... all several hundred thousand of them

Fury and Wilder are duckers hence they have no fans

AJ and Whyte are the real men of the division and this makes you cry everyday on here

 

Not a chicken mate, A duck.

I'm saying he's ducking anyone with a chance against him and has been on the side of favourable judging and reffing more often than most.

Just saying that if your business model is fighting fringe and past it fighters whilst hovering up PPV cash then that's fine, just cut all the BS about "fighting anyone" and being ducked themselves.

Eddie handed him a AJ fight for millions of pounds and he ran for the hills.

 

Parker won a vacant belt but has never been anything special. Solid yes, nothing more though. Top 10 but below the elite and laboured to points wins over Razvan Cojanu and Hughie Fury. Big deal. Charles Martin was also a belt holder as was Bermane Stiverne so being a former champion doesn't necessarily tell the whole story.

What has Rivas done to be considered dangerous? Struggle against a washed up Bryant Jennings who had already been demolished by Luis Ortiz 3 years prior to that? Big deal. Rivas would be considered maybe top 15-20.

 

He didn't fight for nothing though did he? He fought on PPV for good money.

Instead of Parker he could have fought Pulev and literally be fighting for 3 belts in June if not sooner. He would have had a bigger purse split and no rematch clause against Joshua, as I know you like to use that as an excuse as to why he didn't take the fight, but he chose to fight Parker for 'nothing'.

Can you accept those facts are true?

 

Whyte got plenty of help from the ref and you know it. Don't kid yourself bruv.

 

Actuall wilder is ducking him because Whyte was number 1 for ages and now the wbc so he aint been given his shot

so you are blaming whyte for that?

and as for AJ whyte didnt run anywhere.. he stayed in the room and said reverse the rematch split and then AJ ran for this hills

He has fought more contenders and quality opponents than Fury or Wilder

Parker was an ex champ hardly fringe contender?

Povetkin ex champ too.. and showed his levels against Hunter despite being out of prime

You Hunter who is supposedly LEVES ABOVE WHYTE LOOOOL

 

They aren't facts, they are just your opinions.

Whyte had more to lose than to earn 1 million fighting Parker.... ergo... NOTHING to gain.

And Pulev offered crappy value... Whyte still gotta make a buck everytime he steps in the ring as it could be his last... and Pulev tried mugging of Whyte with chump change instead of coming down to the UK for a PPV event where the real money is made.

So that shuts down all your points.

Because if you REALLY WANT TO GET INTO THE FACTS.... what has Pulev been doing past 3 years?? And Whyte???

Yeah thats what I THOUGHT! Who ducks who? And who is actually taking the harder fights.

THATS FACTS looking at someones track record... and Pulev's is abysmal... as is Wilders and Fury's

 

I'm not saying Parker is something special but you're just changing your definitions to suit your fragile argument. Whyte was laughing at Wilder for fighting old blokes. You had a pop but the evidence is Whyte fights opponents younger than Wilder does on average. You then say if he's not fighting old blokes he's fighting bums, but they have to include Rivas and Parker but presumably not Pulev and Kownacki? Am I getting this right? And as for old blokes, Ortiz, who is ancient and even older than Povetkin, is what exactly?

You're all over the place.

 

So you just admitted that Whyte ducked Pulev and you're using money as an excuse? Do you know how much Whyte got offered? Are you part of his team? Is Whyte scared of Pulev? Is Pulev not old and past it enough for Whyte to fight?

 

Nah bruv, you are kidding yourself.

If you take your hater glasses off for just 15 seconds... I could feed you some truth through a baby bottle... like:

1. Parker has 15 years more experience than Whyte AND he's younger!!!!
2. The referee actually allowed Parker to do what he wanted unlike the italian one in the AJ fight who stopped Parker getting in close
3. Parker had a full 12 rounds to do something against the "epileptic, lucky, slow footed, talentless, dillian whyte, who's jaw is average"

And you think Parker should be the first man in history to be given an extra round to win the fight... LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL

 

Rivas and Parker fall under fringe contenders. No need to include Wilder, we're talking about Whyte here, a man fighting his 2nd 40 year old in a row. Who next after he gets the inevitable hometown gift? Bermane Stiverne? Siarhei Liahkovic? Sam Peter? They all fall under the old men and former champions club.