Is Fury planning to duck AJ?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Mar 9, 2020.


  1. Scar

    Scar VIP Member Full Member

    76,120
    2,760
    Jul 20, 2004
    Yeah, a man who went all the way to Germany and handed Wladimir his first loss in 11 years is afraid of a guy who recently lost to a teletubby. :lol:
     
  2. N17

    N17 Loyal Member Full Member

    36,270
    33,086
    Feb 16, 2013
    Neither fighter is ducking the other, no way. I think it will only get more complicated after AJ Vs Pulev and Fury Vs Wilder III.


    I believe the WBC will make the Fury/Wilder III winner franchise champion. That frees up the "regular" WBC belt, so depending on what happens..

    We could have Whyte Vs Usyk for the vacant WBC belt.

    So would Hearn turn his attention to getting an "all the belts" fight with AJ Vs Whyte/Usyk and claim to be undisputed?
     
  3. Naked Snake

    Naked Snake Active Member Full Member

    624
    635
    Feb 25, 2020
    I don't think so. All that's going to happen is either Usyk will insist on his mandatory and Joshua will fight Fury afterwards, or Usyk will agree to step aside in exchange for a guarantee to fight the winner of Joshua/Fury. I don't think Fury's contracted to fight anyone, except Wilder. So when he beats Wilder again he's free to fight Joshua if Joshua doesn't fight Usyk, or fight Whyte or somebody else if Joshua does.

    Personally, if I were Usyk, I'd step aside. The guy's getting injured frequently which suggests he's having difficulty making the weight. Yeah, if Fury and Joshua make a fight it could potentially be two or even three fights which would freeze Usyk out until 2022 at the very latest. But in that time Usyk can get in at least three heavyweight fights and better acclimatise to the division which means he'll be in a better position to fight the ultimate winner of Joshua/Fury once they've had all their fights.
     
  4. Neon Maniac

    Neon Maniac Member Full Member

    319
    172
    Mar 5, 2020
    It’s not meaningless bc AJ has no contract that binds him like Wilder had to Fury and vice versa .

    Bob Arum doesn’t want the fight, Fury has two more fights left on his contract and I know none of them will be AJ .
     
  5. Neon Maniac

    Neon Maniac Member Full Member

    319
    172
    Mar 5, 2020
    Yes they do,in draws contracts are void if there is no winner .

    You basically just made everything up here .Finkle and Warren made the original contracts up before Arum was even in the picture , Warren publicly stated it would be multi fight deal so I don’t no what else to tell you ?


    The rematch claus was void bc of the draw and both had options to take another fight , Fury chose not to when he signed with top rank due to Wilder stalling on his promises to fight Fury in the U.K .

    Wilder said the TWO fights that would take place would be in the U.S and the REMATCH in the U.K , don’t you think this shows itself a rematch was agreed to ? Lol


    This link is telling you a rematch claus was in place of the first one .


    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...erfight.html&usg=AOvVaw3XWfKOh2V5uZ6KxWOHxaNP
     
    Last edited: Mar 10, 2020
  6. Naked Snake

    Naked Snake Active Member Full Member

    624
    635
    Feb 25, 2020
    You do know what mandatories are, right? He has to fight Pulev otherwise they'll strip him
     
    mark ant likes this.
  7. Neon Maniac

    Neon Maniac Member Full Member

    319
    172
    Mar 5, 2020
    That doesn’t even make sense ,that has nothing to do with a future Fury fight . Both guys are fighting in the summer Fury and AJ, BOTH can fight after .
     
  8. Naked Snake

    Naked Snake Active Member Full Member

    624
    635
    Feb 25, 2020
    You're the one making things up
    Again, that's not how rematch clauses work
    That was just spitballing about where a fight might be held. They did not have a contract in place. Fury had to go to the WBC and ask them to order a rematch, which they did. Then they couldn't come to terms on purse splits and where the fight should be held, so the WBC held purse bids. Then Fury signed with ESPN and Top Rank, so they had to work that out because an eventual rematch would have to have been a co-promotion
     
  9. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,267
    1,737
    Jan 4, 2007
    Fury vs AJ is world await. I don't think that they both are ducking each other but their promoters do not want them to fight each other now.
     
  10. AdamT

    AdamT Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,743
    10,146
    Sep 18, 2019
    It's a pity your mother didn't duck meeting your father
     
    mark ant likes this.
  11. Furious

    Furious Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,191
    3,944
    Nov 2, 2017
    Where's the article then Mark?
     
  12. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    No AJ has to fight Usyk in a mandatory for the WBO title after Pulev.
     
  13. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
  14. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Fury lost to Price in the amateurs when he was 17, but still managed to floor the weak chinned Price in the second round of that bout.
     
  15. Jamzy ⭐

    Jamzy ⭐ Active Member Full Member

    1,468
    957
    Oct 8, 2018
    Lads. It's the Metro.