91 Foreman vs Wilder

Let's be honest, both of them had far better fundamentals than Wilder.

 

I think that 91 Foreman was clearly better than 93-97 Foreman. Was more dynamic,solid,used the jab and when you are an athlete in your 40s A few years of difference matter

 

True, but it doesn't make him better then. He just faced not durable fighter who was willing to trade with him. 1991 George was definitely better than the one who won the title.

 

Alex Stewart ?? Lol. No...

 

So just one year after Foreman loses to Holyfield he’s massively deteriorated despite fighting on for another six and capturing a world title ? I don’t think so. I disagree that he “ walks over wilder “ the way you say he does. Foreman would be getting hurt by his shots too

 

Post 1993 yes. But I do think the one who fought Stewart 1992 just one year after fighting holy and a full three years before beating Moorer was massively deteriorated.. bottom line is that I don’t see Foreman walking all over Wilder.

 

Wilder doesn't even have a jab !

 

He didn't but he got slower every next fight. I don't think that he would simply walk over Wilder, but he has stylistic advantages over him and he was at his best in second career in 1991.

 

Stewart fight was really strange, he almost knocked him out quickly but for some reasons his face couldn't deal with Stewart punches... very unusual for Foreman.

 

I remember. I saw it that night

 

1991 George Foreman loses to modern day Deontay Wilder by unanimous decision. George did get busted up facially by Alex Stewart, but won, ater he lost to a quicker Tommy Morrison. Wilder would keep him at bay with the left jab and movement. After the bout George hits Deontay over the head, with one of his famed George Foreman Grills. Deontay tells George, You Don't Get A Rematch For That.

 

Don’t know what some folks are seeing.Wilder is tailor made for Goerge.I would be surpised if Wilder survives the early rounds.Deontay would not be able to deal with Foreman’s pressure.Foreman is stronger, better chin, better jab, more experienced and plain simple a more complete fighter(given Wilder’s lack of fundamentals)

 

George had much better jab though.

 

Past prime foreman is a stationary target and wilder would definitely fight him .

Foreman would have wilder in trouble in some places however wilder returns fire and stops foreman


Prime foreman is a different story

 

Do you mean "Down Goes Wilder??"