Michael Spinks vs Gene Tunney

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Entaowed, Mar 12, 2020.


  1. Entaowed

    Entaowed Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    6,837
    4,174
    Dec 16, 2012
    Both considered greats at LHW
    Both with a thinner resume at HW
    How would you rate them as opponents in EACH division?

    With modern weight training Spinks added enough muscle to have a significant size advantage
    Would that prove to be the difference at HW?
     
  2. InMemoryofJakeLamotta

    InMemoryofJakeLamotta I have defeated the great Seamus Full Member

    16,387
    11,823
    Sep 21, 2017
    Tough fight for Michael, but I pick him to win a decision at both weights
     
  3. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    16,328
    15,422
    Jun 9, 2007
  4. zadfrak

    zadfrak Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,518
    3,118
    Feb 17, 2008
    Mean Gene. And I think wins fairly comfortably.
     
  5. RockyJim

    RockyJim Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,241
    2,437
    Mar 26, 2005
  6. CharlesBurley

    CharlesBurley Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,065
    1,880
    Feb 23, 2020
    Styles - both counter punchers but Spinks also likes to fight inside more than Tunney

    Physically - Spinks is 2 inches taller, so an advantage for him here

    Jabs - both good jabs for sure, no clear advantage

    Right hand - probably Tunney straight rights from range but Spinks employed a fast overhand right that could be devastating

    Defense - Spinks employed a higher guard and has better head movement to shot slips. I think so advantage

    Speed - similar, although Spinks a bit more explosive

    Outfighting - Spinks slight advantage. Spinks is taller, Tunney has a better right but Spinks has a better defence.

    Body attack - big Spinks advantage. Tunney mostly went for head shots but Spinks uses the jab to set up left hooks to the head and body. In a long fight you'd imagine it gives him an advantage in the championship rounds.

    Left hook - Spinks all day long, much better short punches

    Combinations - Spinks is much smoother at putting combinations together and this should see him rack up points and damage.

    Stamina - fairly similar

    Workrate/Stamina - fairly close, Spinks has the advantage that when he's tired he can come inside and bang your body while leaning on his opponent

    Inside - big Spinks advantage

    Chin - both similar levels

    Power - clear edge to Spinks, he's stopping opponents at a more emphatic rate at LHW at he has some devastating knock outs.

    Overall - Spinks, he's better inside fighter, better technical boxer, more devastating puncher, better body attack. He should win probably a KO around the 8th or 10th.
     
  7. Dance84

    Dance84 Unicorn and seastar land Full Member

    8,066
    5,453
    Oct 11, 2017
  8. Drew101

    Drew101 Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    29,772
    8,306
    Feb 11, 2005
  9. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,916
    46,727
    Feb 11, 2005
    Spinks... with a significant likelihood of a KO.
     
  10. Richard M Murrieta

    Richard M Murrieta Now Deceased 2/4/25 Full Member

    22,635
    30,410
    Jul 16, 2019
    Michael Spinks, after a wild chase for 10 rounds finally lands the Spinks Jinx and puts an end to this high speed chase. The end comes for Gene Tunney as he did his best.
     
  11. FrankinDallas

    FrankinDallas FRANKINAUSTIN

    30,168
    37,014
    Jul 24, 2004
    Could not have said it better. Plus M Spinks was kind of crazy. Always go with the crazy guy in a fight.
     
  12. Bonecrusher

    Bonecrusher Lineal Champion Full Member

    3,429
    1,161
    Jul 19, 2004
    Great Breakdown. :campeon:
     
  13. JC40

    JC40 Boxing fan since 1972 banned Full Member

    1,098
    1,870
    Jul 12, 2008
    Great post.
     
  14. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,209
    25,517
    Jan 3, 2007
    me too
     
  15. he grant

    he grant Historian/Film Maker

    25,469
    9,471
    Jul 15, 2008
    Tough match up .. I really like both guys .. Spinks a bit taller but Gene may have had 1" in reach actually .. Tunney was smarter and maybe a bit faster but Spinks was certainly fast enough. I think Tunney was physically a bit stronger, a bit better conditioned and a sharper puncher but Spinks was very fast as well and possibly a bigger puncher. Both had great chins but I'd even favor Gene there .. One poster here made a case that Tunney didn't go to the body but if you read coverage of his Greb fights as well as Carpentier and Gibbons, Tunney was a nasty body puncher ... I have no clue here. Two terrific fighters .. A decision either way ..
     
    Last edited: Mar 13, 2020
    Richard M Murrieta likes this.