How do you rank the big 5 belts in order

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by WordGreat, Mar 19, 2020.


  1. WordGreat

    WordGreat New Member Full Member

    71
    37
    Jun 28, 2019
    Obviously the big 5 are the WBC, WBO, WBF, IBF and WBA


    What’s most prestigious??
     
  2. African Cobra

    African Cobra The Right Honourable Lord President of the Council Full Member

    26,909
    9,826
    May 29, 2007
    WBA and WBC are top followed by IBF then WBO. I remember back in the day when it was suggested Julio Cesar Chavez fight for the WBO title at Welterweight he was confused and said “what is a WBO”?
     
    Contro and Ivan28 like this.
  3. TEAM_LOMA

    TEAM_LOMA This is Boxing Full Member

    1,530
    1,766
    Mar 13, 2019
    Ring, WBC, WBA, IBF, WBO in that order
     
  4. Big Ukrainian

    Big Ukrainian Boxing Junkie Full Member

    10,647
    9,457
    Jan 10, 2007
    1) IBF
    2) WBC
    3) WBO


    4) WBA (all their 50 belts)
     
  5. Eggman

    Eggman "The cream of the crop! Nobody does it better! Full Member

    4,332
    3,777
    Dec 2, 2015
    Heart says

    WBC
    WBA
    RING
    IBF
    WBO


    head says due to being the least corrupt

    IBF
    WBO
    RING
    WBC
    WBA
     
  6. Cafe

    Cafe Sitzpinkler Full Member

    37,899
    7,495
    Sep 2, 2011
    Honestly at this point they're all the same. I don't put any more stake in WBC over WBO. It just depends on the opponents the fighter has faced. I don't even know who has which belts.
     
  7. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,860
    10,014
    Oct 29, 2012
    This. ^^ We aren't in the 1960's anymore where it was apparent which belts meant the most. Today's boxing is a completely different landscape.

    Boxing today is run as more business than a fair sport.
     
    Holler likes this.
  8. SmackDaBum

    SmackDaBum TKO7 banned Full Member

    5,191
    1,715
    Nov 22, 2014
    IBF
    WBO
    WBA
    IBO
    Ring

    WBC
     
    Hurrikeen likes this.
  9. aaalbert

    aaalbert Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,041
    2,022
    Jan 15, 2015
    The one with the most “special” belts should be ranked the lowest...
     
    Holler likes this.
  10. miniq

    miniq AJ IS A BODYBUILDING BUM Full Member

    47,302
    27,023
    Oct 23, 2011
    They are all trash and have horrible horrible histories of corruption.

    1. Who you beat
    2. When you beat them
    3. How you beat them



    is the only thing that matters in boxing. Belts don't matter. Titles don't matter.

    The resume is all that matters, but it must be scrutinized by the above three parameters

    Even Olympic medals have them corruption issues.


    People like to say AJ's resume is better than Fury's, not really if you delve deeper.

    Nobody predicts fight outcomes based on who holds what titles/belts do they? They are irrelevant.
     
    Last edited: Mar 19, 2020
  11. The Real Lance

    The Real Lance Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,860
    10,014
    Oct 29, 2012

    Good post. Waaay too many "knowledgeable" posters use a fighting simply winning a belt to try and inflate another fighters resume.

    "Oh, he beat the WBA champ!" Unless one is the recognized world champ of the division, he beat what would essentially be just a top contender.
     
  12. the commentator

    the commentator Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,468
    269
    Oct 26, 2011
    The WBA is a joke...Regular Champion, Super Champion, Interim Champion,Super Duper Champion, and all their other comedy belts....
     
    h8me and Big Ukrainian like this.
  13. Ivan28

    Ivan28 Active Member Full Member

    645
    436
    Feb 13, 2018
    WBC
    WBA
    IBF

    WBO(i don't like the politics in that organization about russian boxers and russian promoting companies).

    More belts make boxing more popular.Only WBC and WBA is not better than WBC, WBA, IBF, WBO.If we have one fight for one belt and 3 fights for nothing, they will be less popular then 4 fights for 4 belts.Thinking in that logic, i wonder, maybe these WBC silver, WBA Gold, and so on, at the end are also not so bad for the sport.
     
    BELLERS likes this.
  14. northpaw

    northpaw Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,964
    10,401
    Jun 5, 2010
    WBC
    IBF
    WBA
    WBO

    WBF? surely you jest.............
     
  15. Leoh

    Leoh Boxing Junkie Full Member

    13,749
    1,239
    Dec 19, 2014
    1- WBC
    2- WBA
    3- IBF
    For me, this is the absolute order of the biggest 3 belts.
    -----------
    4- WBO
    5- IBO
    -----------
    WBO and IBO are really worthless in my opinion. I consider EBU better than these 2.