Pernell Whitaker: Sweet Scientist

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by mark ant, Mar 20, 2020.


  1. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    He wasn`t very charismatic.
     
  2. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    That makes sense, Floyd is more charismatic than Whitakder was but not as charming as Ray was, he`s somewhere in between.
     
    Bronze Tiger likes this.
  3. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,079
    4,902
    Jun 24, 2017
    He weren’t no Mark Antman that’s for sure.
     
    mark ant and WAR01 like this.
  4. JackSilver

    JackSilver Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,079
    4,902
    Jun 24, 2017
    Chavez moving up from super featherweight and taking apart big punching Rosario and taking his lightweight title in 87 was Chavez at his best.
     
  5. salsanchezfan

    salsanchezfan Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,800
    11,425
    Aug 22, 2004
    He wasn't far gone at all. Revisionist history there I'm afraid.
     
    Charlietf and mark ant like this.
  6. WAR01

    WAR01 In the 7.2% Full Member

    1,776
    1,540
    Aug 19, 2019
    If only there was a press conference with Ant and Ali it would be an unforgettable experience Ant would definitely have the edge pre fight but in the ring his infinite charisma wouldn't help him fight that's for sure maybe he could convince someone better to get in the ring?

    Like our own resident warrior the Morlocks?
     
    mark ant likes this.
  7. mr. magoo

    mr. magoo VIP Member Full Member

    51,179
    25,432
    Jan 3, 2007
    The 1990’s was a very tight group of talent which was so dense that you had all time greats who went unnoticed.. within this deep pool of tremendous fighters you had a few who finished the decade very close in terms of their value to boxing history... To get to the point, I think Pernell Whitaker had a strong case to being the best fighter of that decade but Roy Jones and possibly a select few others are very close.
     
  8. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    Whitaker was far better than Rosario.
     
  9. Charlietf

    Charlietf Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,503
    Feb 25, 2020
    :lol:
     
    mark ant likes this.
  10. Charlietf

    Charlietf Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,503
    Feb 25, 2020
    Yes and whitaker was a Thomas hearns at 147 lmao
     
    mark ant likes this.
  11. Charlietf

    Charlietf Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,503
    Feb 25, 2020
    Exactly . whitaker dominates chavez anyday
     
  12. Charlietf

    Charlietf Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,503
    Feb 25, 2020
    Whitaker was SMALL for 147. And what he could win had more to do with his great quality as fiighter than his small size
     
  13. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    He didn`t have the power of a 154 fighter and didn`t have a better chin than Chavez so what is your point about his body being able to carry 154lbs what advantage would that give Whitaker at 147? He didn`t hit harder than Chavez and wouldn`t be able to take Chavez`s poer better than Julio could take Pea`s power, so what possible advantage would Whitaker have being able to climb to 154 where he didn`t even look that good anyway.
     
  14. mark ant

    mark ant Canelo was never athletic Full Member

    36,654
    16,562
    May 4, 2017
    What advantage did that give Whitaker against Chavez though?