Jim Jeffries v Tyson Fury 15rds?

He wouldn't have fought him if he had ducked him. I don't see any reason to discuss about it. Feel free to disagree.

 

You don't need to use capslock, I understand you without it.
You said that Fitz was past prime in first fight too, that's why I mentioned these two fights.
Fitz was also so past his prime that after 2nd Jeffries he beat Gardner for LHW title and defended it against O'Brian.

 

Fury would toy with this primitive chap.

 

Eh, you'd never give Jeffries credit would you?

 

People weren't more primitive 120 years ago. What is wrong with you?

 

Having fun with your hate thread?

 

Look old man, Fitz was as deadly as every on the comeback trail ( After losing to Jeffries ), producing a fatality, brutally KO'ing Ruhlin and waxing Sharkey in two rounds. He was obviously not past his best to get results like this vs. munch younger top opponents. Even when Fitz lost to Jeffries in the re-match, he wasn't done from beating name fighters winning the light heavyweight belt vs Gardner and Beating Jack O' Brien in 1904, which took place two plus years after the Jeffries re-match.

Get your facts fight! Fitz got his re-match and wasn't an easy person to agree to terms with. Jeffries wasted to avenge a dubious draw with Ruhlin first, and fought two other times before that in 1901.

Did Langford, Jeannete or Mcvey get their re-match while Johnson was champion? Lol. How about Willis getting a match period vs Jack Dempsey? Lol again. Hatred exposed, with a twist of the old double standards.

 

It were his last fights before Jeffries rematch. Sure, it happened almost 2 years after, but it doesn't change the fact. You are extremely officious with your replies, you take every single word literally and you want to correct everybody even when it's not needed.

 

Which champiom gave rematch the former champion rematch in that era? Tunney was the second one, after over 25 years. Don't measure his choices by modern standard. Jeffries was active champion and he ducked nobody.