Feel free to post where Wilder ever said that. Otherwise, I'll assume you made that up. Which means you're lying. Wilder fought the WORLD CHAMPION twice, and he's fighting him again in October. Joshua has never fought the World Champion. Not once. Not twice. Wilder has a better resume than Joshua. And Wilder is fighting the world champion AGAIN (THIRD TIME) in October. Joshua is fighting Pulev. You can make up all the **** you want, but it isn't going to change that. Wilder has the better resume. And the better chin. Deal with it.
I would say Joshua has the worse chin. Joshua has better boxing fundamentals, but a lousy chin. Joshua also has worse stamina. Wilder gets wobbled occasionally Biggest difference between the two if Joshua quit when the going got tough, Wilder took his beating like champ.
Frank Warren and Team Fury have said they had to tell Wilder Fury was finished to lure him to taking the fight so nah boss, another fail from you in this thread. If Wilder had known Fury was still really the number one fighter in the division he would of wanted no part of him and now he's cashing out because there's no easy route for him to rebuild. Now do you want to retract your silly point about the relevance of how many times Joshua has been dropped in his career compared with Wilder or not?
holy **** what am I reading? only the most deluded of fanboys must think for a 2nd that wilder has beaten better fighters than Joshua. That or someone doesn't know what resume means.
You can't even type the three best guys they stopped. You didn't even try with Parker and Ruiz. So who is being biased? In fact, I'm one of the few people on this thread who is not being biased about their chins. I don't think Wilder has some awesome chin. Not at all. But it isn't as bad as Joshua's. Wilder didn't run for his life against someone like Andy Ruiz because he was afraid of getting knocked out again. Joshua didn't even trust his chin to hold up against Ruiz in their rematch. And Ruiz ISN'T A PUNCHER.
Apparently, you don't know what a resume means. When you list Dereck Chisora's resume, do you only list his wins?
In fact, you're the "most deluded of fanboys" as that Keed said. You mean Wilder can't out-box someone the calibre of Gerald Washington? You. You are being biased. It's clear that all 4 are punchers, their highlights show it. And to be honest, the fact that you're using 3 names as a ballpark, means that Wilder isn't a puncher either since his 3 best KOs wins aren't better than Povetkin's. Okay. Okay. Whatever you say love. Keep telling yourself that. I'll still be around when Wilder gets retired in October.
Fury is looking forward to registering an even more emphatic victory over his rival. “I’ll be obliged to give him a bit more," he said during an appearance ITV's Good Morning Britain. “You never get bored of beating Deontay Wilder, obviously. It’s one of those things you take great pride out of doing."
Gerald Washington? WTF are you talking about? Wilder stopped Washington in five. And, after FOUR rounds, Wilder was ahead officially. Washington wasn't ahead on any cards and couldn't survive five. So I have no idea what you're trying to say.
This is another thing you regular hide behind that makes the rest of us cringe. The official scorecards in a lot of Wilder's fights have been absolutely ****ing terrible to the point in which I think some of the judges involved should be investigated. Luckily for him though he was always able to score the KO win anyway so it didn't matter and didn't attract much attention.
You refuse to list who their best KOs came against. Their highlights against who? You mean Povetkin's highlight reel KO of Wach? (Didn't you list that as one of his big KOs?) Or Whyte's highlight reel KO of Helenius and Rivas and Wach?