Why did Floyd use USADA and not VADA?

You're framing the argument in a way which sidesteps the main question being put to you. Yes, he didn't fail a drug test and no banned substance was found in his sample. It's my understanding that's accepted by everyone here. So we can move on from those facts to other facts.

Subsequent to the fight, it became evident he had administered an IV in quantities which are deemed illegal by drug testers - because they can be used as a masking agent - and only thought applicable for someone suffering the kind of medical emergency which would typically require hospitalisation.

Considering there is no evidence he was suffering a medical emergency of that magnitude, why do you think he chose to take that IV? And are you comfortable with the fact no good reason has ever been given?

 

Pimp C’s comments are authoritative and instructive because it comes from Bob Bennett. Your questions are akin to questioning the decision of the Supreme Court and the Chief Justice after they have handed down their judgment.

 

It's just easier to call them FAKE NEWS and continue to fool one's self I suppose... I mean...FFS gyus.. it doesn't make one less of a fan to open their mind to some suspicious activities involving tens of millions and a CORRUPT SPORT?!

 

I am satisfied with both USADA and NSAC the best Sports Commission in the world bar none. They made it clear he had done nothing wrong. It’s not Mayweather saying it rather it’s the authority’s. There has been no judicial review of their decisions yes so I am very satisfied. These attempts to stain the character and reputation of Floyd Mayweather wholly fail.

 

You aren't even attempting to produce a counter-argument. "Floyd was cleared, that's all that matters...."

 

But what reason do you think there was for such a large administration of IV which is normally reserved for someone who would need hospitalisation?

What was the purpose?

 

Because I don’t have to nor does it need to be re-litigated. All I am dealing with are the cogent facts! He was cleared and he took no banned substances or failed any tests.

 

Absolutely irrelevant!

 

Since you add nothing to this, how about just ****ing off from the thread then? No one needs to read the posts of someone who willfully play dumb because they love a particular boxer. You're dealing with the RESULTS provided like a blind little sheep, NOT the facts involved.

 

You're a ****ing coward..

 

More often than not when someone avoids a question it's the answer they like even less than the question itself.

 

I would advise you to advice yourself accordingly! I know you find the facts uncomfortable because you would like nothing more than to discredit Mayweather’s achievements. Unfortunately for you the facts defeat you.

 

Please come up to me at a boxing show and say that to my face. We shall see who is in fact a coward.

 

Why do you think the reason for taking a huge dose of IV is 'irrelevant'? Wouldn't you at least agree his motive for taking it is absolutely central to the issue?

 

Oh what psychobabble and rubbish. There a multitude of reasons why a person might have an injection. You don’t know you just want to speculate. I refuse to speculate and substantiate your BS.