So you accept it is one of the potential reasons. Then we agree. And actually, at no point have I stated what I think. As I said before, all I did was ask you some reasonable questions....
You raised it as per the article so that points to your disposition . Don’t start back tracking. I don’t recognize it as a possible reason at all! Personally I think it’s BS frankly.
No backtracking, that's a real straw man argument you're making right there. How can I backtrack when I haven't stated my point of view?
Tacitly, you did by not ruling it out in previous posts. But not wanting to straw man you, I'll accept the clarification...
To each their own. I have made my position clear on this topic. Those who don’t agree with me are entitled to their opinions as I am to mine.
I’ve already told you countless times that Bob Bennett didn’t even know what had happened. Think about that for a second. You keep telling us all that you only deal in facts, yet I’ve given you 14 facts which you have completely ignored. If you don’t agree with my opinions, no problem. But you cannot ignore the facts. Look at what Bennett was faced with. He only had two options: 1. Sweep it in under the carpet. 2. Be embroiled in a huge investigation which would have had huge implications on his character and his commission. How many tests did Lance Armstrong pass? Without context, all of your questions are worthless. They mean nothing. You’re just hiding behind them, like a small child sticking its fingers in its ears, whilst telling people they’re not listening. You know. I know that you do.
My points are clear so we are going to have to agree to disagree ! What Bob Bennett knew at a particular point in time or did not know for that matter you don’t know you are merely relying on an article . The fact is the organization knew. The CEO or Chairman does not have to know about everything what is important is those responsible for certain things in an organization know and report accordingly. If NSAC have made their pronouncement then that’s it as far as I am concerned. I will not be debating unsubstantiated points.
This topic has been brought up a million times and dissected to the atom, so I am not here for that.. I'm here for your Lance Armstrong comment.. He actually used fake samples when he had to give them and once a liter of saline he smuggled under his coat.. His go to move was not to test at all because it wasn't always going to work.. He would get notified when testers came and he just left.. Not only that, he actually did test positive but his doctor covered for him or he paid to keep the test hidden...
I don’t agree with his article and he knows that and like I said it’s not proven Floyd has done anything wrong. In fact I know he has not.
Fine. The facts are he was cleared. You like facts. So: Let’s look at the 14 facts that YOUR FRIEND published. How about that? Or are you only interested in certain ones and not all of them?
What a joker you are. It’s extremely relevant. Stop acting like a child. You’re embarrassing yourself.
Bob Bennett & the NSAC are crooked as a corkscrew all they want is $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Dont forget old Bob is an ex FBI agent too