ATG: Four Decades later, Who is the Greatest of the Fab 4?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by asero, May 4, 2020.


Who is the Greatest of the Fab 4

This poll will close on Sep 19, 2047 at 7:17 PM.
  1. Roberto Duran

    41 vote(s)
    55.4%
  2. Marvin Hagler

    11 vote(s)
    14.9%
  3. Tommy Hearns

    9 vote(s)
    12.2%
  4. Sugar Ray Leonard

    13 vote(s)
    17.6%
  1. asero

    asero Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,367
    305
    Jan 8, 2009
    For a boxer to be tagged as an ATG, he must be timeless. Now that the Fab 4 Era is 4 decades ago, who do we ranked as the greatest of the greats.

    Roberto Duran
    Lightweight
    1968-2001
    103-16-0 (70)
    W15 Leonard, KO13 Buchanan, KO11 De Jesus
    Considered as the best fighter of 1970s and the true boxing superstar. Known for his trash taking, aggressive brawling and devasting punching power in both hands, the Hands of Stone is considered as the greatest lightweight ever
    The real reason of his No Mas fight with Sugar Ray Leonard is still a mystery but it is well documented that he did not prepared well in the Leonard rematch

    Marvin Hagler
    Middleweight
    1973-1987
    62-3-2 (52)
    KO3 Hearns, KO11 Mugabi, W15 Duran
    War medal for the Marvelous one. Easily one of the fan favorite because of his warrior attitude coupled with devastating punching power in both hands. Also possess one of the best chin in the sport that allows him to brawl.
    His decision to walk away from the sport at age 32 following the controversial lost to Sugar Ray Leonard left a bad taste on most of the boxing fans. There are reports that he even rejected a bigger payday for a rematch with Leonard one or two years later.

    Tommy Hearns
    Welterweight
    1977-2006
    61-5-1 (48)
    KO2 Duran, W15 Benitez, KO2 Cuevas
    Freak of an athlete with dynamite hands. The Hitman is a head to head beast at welterweight. He continues his career to pick up titles all the way up to Light Heavyweight with the same enthusiasm and vigor
    His boxing style of choosing to engage rather than to box have caused him the two biggest fights of his career. Had he learn to effectively use his size, will we see his losses easily become wins?

    Sugar Ray Leonard
    Welterweight
    1977-1997
    36-3-1 (25)
    KO14 Hearns, KO15 Benitez, KO8 Duran
    Took the mantle from Muhammad Ali as the face of Boxing in the 80s. His main strength is his combinations coupled with sound defence. Went on to have Top 3 resume is welterweight of all time. Some would argue that his welterweight run is better than Sugar Ray Robinson and Kid Gavilan
    Having a short career due to injury and controversial win against Marvin Hagler did not catapult him as the undisputed greatest fighter in the Fab 4 era
     
    Bofo24 and kostya by ko like this.
  2. KO KIDD

    KO KIDD Loyal Member Full Member

    30,027
    5,550
    Oct 5, 2009
    Personally I like Duran hearns and hagler more than Leonard but I think it has to be Leonard
     
  3. 22JM

    22JM Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,452
    3,927
    Sep 10, 2016
    Duran ,SRL, Hagler then Hearns.
     
  4. catchwtboxing

    catchwtboxing Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,641
    33,487
    Jul 4, 2014
    Duran close thread. He never, ever should have beat Leonard. That was pure will power and a bit of psychology.
     
  5. Dangerwood84

    Dangerwood84 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,542
    12,491
    Sep 21, 2017
    I have it in order :
    1. Duran, longest career span of the four, most fan friendly style, beat Leonard in first fight when both were virtually in their prime.
    2. Leonard, amazing skills, very gifted but nowhere near as many pro fights as Duran and lost to Duran first time around. Personally growing up, he was my favourite of the fab 4. Gets second because he beat Hearns and Leonard.
    3. Tommy Hearns, got beat by Hagler and Leonard but was beating Leonard first time around and probably got him in the rematch. Blew away Duran which counts big, if only his chin was better he would nearly have been the perfect fighter.
    4. Hagler, great run as middle champ but lost to a a past prime Leonard who was virtually out of the ring for 5 years, this cost's him big in my rankings. If he beats Leonard and retires, he's a lock at no.2. He beat Hearns and Duran but feel overall those two fighters did more in their careers.
     
  6. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,097
    3,876
    Aug 2, 2013
    No debate here, Duran is streets ahead
     
    Reinhardt and catchwtboxing like this.
  7. Nopporn

    Nopporn Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,249
    1,729
    Jan 4, 2007
    Leonard is the best of the FAB 4. Leonard beat all of them Hearns, Duran, and Hagler. It's not so difficult to choose.
     
  8. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,097
    3,876
    Aug 2, 2013
    Duran



    Leonard
    Hagler
    Hearns

    Tommy was better than Ray and Marvin.
     
  9. Babality

    Babality KTFO!!!!!!! Full Member

    28,855
    14,369
    Dec 6, 2008
    Duran and Leonard are the best. Duran impresses me in his ability as an older, out of his weight class boxer, to still be competitive due to his great boxing skills. Leonard couldn't do that.
     
  10. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    395,970
    78,194
    Nov 30, 2006
    Last place of the four (Hearns, obviously) is far easier than splitting the other three.
     
    The Real Lance likes this.
  11. Bulldog24

    Bulldog24 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,097
    3,876
    Aug 2, 2013
    You can't put Hagler close to Duran or Leonard. Duran would've beaten a peak Hagler on points had it been 12 rounds, and Duran was a lightweight in his prime.

    Hearns was the best boxer on the planet going into the 80s, and would've beaten Leonard on points had it been a 12-rounder. Still the best boxer-puncher in history, Tommy.
     
  12. PernellSweetPea

    PernellSweetPea Boxing Junkie Full Member

    12,099
    5,664
    Feb 26, 2009
    What about Hearns beating Virgil Hill at light heavyweight in 1991.
     
  13. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    34,904
    27,525
    Feb 25, 2015
    "Hagler may or may not be the better fighter, but he is the better Middleweight". What the Detroit paper said following Hagler's knockout.

    What's your take on this? Fair, or sour grapes?

    I get what they were trying to say, but I think that was bad taste. It was a widly entertaining fight and Hagler won dominantly. Just let the man have his moment.

    For what it's worth I'd rate Hagler as the better Middleweight and better p4p fighter anyways.
     
    Last edited: May 5, 2020
  14. theanatolian

    theanatolian Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    17,597
    5,893
    May 2, 2015
    Leonard is the best, Duran is the greatest.
     
    Pompey Junglist and Holler like this.
  15. DirtyOldTown

    DirtyOldTown Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,186
    3,459
    Jul 24, 2016
    Leonard has the best fight record between fights involved all of the 4 but Duran is better than him P4P in history.