Pulev states he will beat AJ because he has more accuracy with his punches

if AJ loses to Pulev then he is officially a hype job.

 

Pulev is so 'accurate' he barely was able to hit slow-as-molasses Ustinov.

 

Pulev says a lot of things it’s best not to pay any attention to what he says

 

Joshua will knock out Pulev just like Klitschko did, Pulev can only rely on a lucky punch...

 

When is this fight happening , and would it be behind close doors ?

 

I should hope he does given the garbage he fights.

Probably a bit easier to land on punchbags like George Arias and Rydell Booker than the likes of Povetkin, Ruiz, Parker etc.

Sadly, I still reckon he's wrong.

 

Won't be behind closed doors due to the massive revenue for a Joshua stadium fight.

 

I don't understand why pulev is the who mandatory. Makes zero sense the guy hasn't won a meaningful fight in 4 years

 

We can say that about every Wilder mandatory , Stiverne, Breazeale , I don’t count Fury because Wilder lost that first fight ,he should be the mandatory for Fury in the second fight they had.

Pulev defeated Hughie Fury for a real title eliminator at least , Pulev would be Wilders best win as far as I’m concerned. Wilder can manipulate his mandatory position , AJ has multiple belts he cannot have that luxury,his team doesn’t look for loop holes .

 

Wlad fought extra aggressive against Pulev, because he was losing the battle on the outside with the jabs. It was the inside hooks that did the job. The bodybuilder will struggle against the Bulgarian badly.

 

Pulev used to be good.

He used to have a good jab and good technique. The version of Pulev from a couple years ago (well, maybe more than "a couple" years) would've been big trouble for AJ -- I think he probably would've even beaten AJ.

Sadly, Pulev has completely lost any ambition and drive he once had. And he's very old now.

AJ should clobber him and Pulev knows this. Pulev is only in this for the money, that's why he would happily take "step-aside money," despite time being his biggest enemy.

 

He has a point. The higher connecting fighter 'ALWAYS' wins the fight.

 

A win over hughie fury 3 years ago is enough to prove to you he at this stage would be wilders best win? What else? Chisora 5 years ago? Losing to wlad?

I don't know why you even brought this up I never even said anything about Wilder. The question is why is pulev getting a shot at all. One guy is a bum the other hasn't won a meaningful fight in half a decade (arguably his entire career) and is almost 40