Are Tyson Fury and Anthony Joshua greater than Jack Dempsey?

What is so strange to pick Sharkey over 40 years old Povetkin? Povetkin isn't much bigger, he's not much better either and he's past his prime at this point.

 

He's not much better?

Are you ****ing crazy??

You are chatting complete ****ing waffle, I cant get over that ANYONE who is involved in the sport, or calls themself a fan would have this opinion.

Absolutely ****ing ridiculous.

 

I'm not sure if you are serious now. I'm sure quite a lot of boxing fans would pick peak Jack Sharkey over 40 years old Povetkin.

 

If you don't want to hear opposing opinions then you probably shouldn't have come on a forum. A more appropriate response would be to say "I disagree because..." Then sight your evidence. If, on the other hand, you don't care to debate or see any opinions other than ones that align with your own you can always place those people on ignore and won't see their posts.

 

I love hearing opposing opinions, it's the SOLE reason I'm here.

How I respond to them is up to me.

You can't debate crazy, and I think that opinion is crazy.



P.S I have already given the reasons why on 2 different threads today.

Go check them out.

 

YOU went out of your way to interact with his comment. His wasn't even targeted at you specifically. There's nothing crazy about a prime world class heavyweight outpointing a 40 year old over the hill heavyweight that was good quality a few years ago.

Of course you're more than welcome to make those kinds of posts but don't be surprised when you receive a perma ban sooner rather than later. I'm sure the mods here have a specific idea of the type of posters they don't want on here. Same as other forums.

 

You don't know what you're talking about, we've been interacting about Sharkey all day.
It was meant light-heartedly so you can do one with the white knighting.


Yes it is crazy, look through discussions I've already had with this guy and you'll see my reasoning.

So I shouldn't respond because it isn't directly aimed at me, yet here you are responding to something not directly aimed at you?

Do you see the irony?

 

The difference is his post was relevant. Yours on the other hand is full of unnecessary profane language that in all honesty makes you look like some dumb hick with a mullet.

Here are just a few of your posts in this thread alone:

I'm not going to go through your post history with anyone. This forum is a whole lot bigger than any two people. Like I said you can post whatever you want but don't be surprised when you get smacked with that ban hammer in the next few months if not sooner.

 

I'll have you know that my mullet has nothing to do with me being a hick, I would have a mullet if I was rich.

I mean first off, those are clearly out of context.

Second off, the **** does it matter if I swear? The **** gets censored anyway.

Third off, I'll take that advice from the mods.
Right now you come across as an internet PCSO a paid snitch, and a white knight.

Get over yourself.

 

I just read through this thread and most of the things you quoted me as saying on THIS thread, are from other threads.

Didn't you just say youre not gonna go through my post history?

Silly boy.

 

Roger that bro

 

You post so much trash you can't even remember where you're posting it. No my friend, all of those quotes are from this thread.

 

Yes I would.

 

Povetkin is done.

He is going to be a number on another contenders balance sheet very soon.

Sorry that you had to hear it from me!

 

I'm not a Povetkin fan.

I respect that you stand by the steaming pile of **** you left on the floor. Genuinely.

You are probably right in regards to Povetkin being another number for a contender soon though.