Floyd's resume.

I thought we were done?

You still haven’t explained why Floyd wouldn’t make the fight after Manny had agreed the 14 day cut off.

 

STOP!

If someone else had beaten Manny back in 2015, you’re opinion would be completely different.

You have destroyed your own argument by saying this:

You can’t claim that he was prime in 2015, when you wrote this just 2 weeks ago.


Yes, some fighters age differently depending on their styles.

Age and ring age are two completely different things.

Everyone’s circumstances are different.

No two guys are the same.

Knowledgable boxing fans can appreciate this. But Manny Pacquiao was not in his prime when he was 36 in 2015.

Manny’s prime was when he fought the likes of Oscar, Cotto, Hatton and Marg etc.


You are fooling nobody.

 

The guy is desperate to hype Floyd’s resume.

You can still be a world class fighter when you’re past your prime.

Bernard Hopkins wasn’t in his prime when he fought Calzaghe.

Calzaghe wasn’t in his prime when he fought Roy.

Roy wasn’t in his prime when he fought Tarver.

Honestly, these guys are too much.

One minute Manny’s looking poor against Brandon Rios, the next minute he’s prime.

One minute Manny is chasing Floyd for a payday because he’s faded after Marquez had iced him, the next minute he’s prime.

These guys are completely irrational.

Anybody who thinks that Canelo and Manny were prime when Floyd fought them, needs a good slapping.

Honestly, it’s absolutely hilarious.

If Floyd had beaten Manny with Manny’s right hand tied behind his back, there’d be posters on here the next day, saying:

“But he’s a southpaw. It’s his left that’s the most important to him”

Im not going to lie, I love debating these guys. They give me so much entertainment.

 

This post of yours was ‘liked’ by Pimp.


This is another quote from you:

This is Pimp’s opinion on the Canelo fight:

What do you think about that?

Wasn’t Floyd in his prime for Canelo?

He’d had less fights, less ring wear.

Was he prime against Manny?

How about for Berto and McGregor?

 

Do you mean REALLY defeated or NSAC & Vegas decision "wins" ???

 

You really can’t answer the question can you!

 

Can you answer my question ??????

 

well that was explained Mayweather wanted full random testing because of Manny’s excuses he was willing to give him a cut off but after going through full testing himself he went back to what was originally in the contract FULL TESTING.

let’s be adults here and speak logically if me and you met on the street and I disrespected you and you cut me a break then I come back and disrespect you again I doubt I’ll get a break the second time.
Same concept drug testing is and should be a nine issue because of the excuses he was willing to negotiate Manny said no and lost his power.

the fact that fans are trying to arguing drug testing being bad is honestly embarrassing,

 

The fact that one of the fighters made the call WHEN THEY STARTED seems to be nothing for you guys...

 

You are not asking a question you are having a another rant against NSAC the best sports commission in the world and Las Vegas the fight capital of the world.

 

Fantastic video Serge. Excellent Tutorial of the work of Emeritus Professor Floyd Mayweather.

 

Floyd makes it clear that his record speaks for itself. Wishes Pacquiao well.

http://www.fighthype.com/news/article42323.html

 

the biggest fight of all time and a fighter asks for the best drug testing, if you clean it’s not an issue also random drug testing means random as soon as pen to paper they can come at any time. I’m good though because there is no legit argument as to why drug testing was an issue. Except for the fact that you like Manny and you admitting him ducking would expose the whole Mayweather is a cherry picker argument ppl claim.