Canelo is a better fighter than Golovkin.

Exciting is subjective skills aren't remember that.

 

I've already answered it you just didn't like my answer.

 

Sure guess I must have missed that lol

 

You should just stop following boxing and come back when Canelo retires.

Instead of talking nonsense, be learned.


https://www.espn.com/boxing/story/_/id/28030000/wbc-reveals-new-rules-banned-drug-clenbuterol

 

The Polls on here are always spot on.....Have no problems with them.!!!

 

As to who is better, we had our answer over two razor-close fights. Whether you think one or the other barely won, or should have received a close-but-comfortable decision, or were both a draw, we saw one man slightly past his best vs a man entering his peak, and the latter was caught using PEDs and cleared his name with the faulty follicle test (ineffective against blondies and gingers) and a downright silly excuse. No amount of debating, hand-waving, or "lol'ing" will change that. At his best, GGG was better than Canelo.

Likewise, we also know who is greater (insofar as we define 'greatness' as 'accomplishments + quality victories'). GGG did not fight a lot of top guys; Canelo, Jacobs, Derevyanchenko, and maaaaaybe David Lemieux? (I do not count the Kell Brook slaughter any more than I count the Amir Khan KO for Canelo). Cotto, Kirkland, Lara, Trout, Jacobs, GGG, Kovalev (I was one of the guys who thought Ginger-Snaps would get slaughtered), plus championships in multiple weight classes and became a major star in boxing who everyone chases for the payday; Canelo has him beat.

The particulars here don't matter here to me; whether you think GGG was avoided by everyone or he was the one avoiding, whether you think Canelo got deserved wins or undeserved decisions, the bottom line is that Canelo's resume is top-tier, and GGG's is barely adequate for a top guy. The only thing 'dunk-worthy' is that super-middleweight title win, and in this day and age of multi-titles from even the same governing bodies, that's almost an (unfortunate) inevitability.

'Greater' or 'Better', both are fairly clear-cut. Debating this issue to me is just trying to argue for the sake of arguing.

That said, both men should be praised and lauded for refusing to fight that overhyped boring piece of **** Demetrius Andrade. Praise be to these two glorious men for continuing to troll that walking cure for insomnia.

 

Jab - GGG
Chin - GGG
Speed - Canelo
Footwork - GGG
Combinations - Canelo
Timing - GGG
Power - GGG
Defense - Canelo
Right hand - GGG
Left hand - GGG
Uppercut - Canelo
Reflexes - Canelo
Stamina - GGG
Head movement - Canelo
Punch variation - GGG
Long range - GGG
Mid-range - GGG
Inside - Canelo
Bodywork - Canelo


They fought twice, GGG was 3-4 years past his prime, they are about the same size, Canelo was caught cheating. Canelo gave up a legitimate belt to not fight a prime GGG. When they finally fought, majority of people had GGG winning both fights, that anwers the question

 

Actually, skills probably are subjective. Hence why people can debate about who's more skilled between two fighters.

 

Skills are less subjective for example only a hater or fool would argue that pbf isnt a great counter puncher. Whereas some one arguing that if he's exciting or not is up for debate. Some appreciate master boxers and find that exciting others appreciate brawlers and find them exciting some appreciate all styles.

 

And what does it make Mayweather? The GOAT?
But I'm sure you don't have a hidden agenda in your post

 

No one has made that claim on Floyd....

 

Pbf isnt even a top 10 ATG let alone the GOAT. But he is the best fighter of the era.

 

It's called making a point

 

You tried to make a point on something no one here says? good battle...