Floyd's resume.

No he had surgery actually after the fighter.

 

I don’t know why he didn’t bring it up. He’s brought it up in other interviews. It would be nice to ask him that question. But the post fight interview was only about 5 mins.

It’s not relevant is it.

The point is, whether he mentioned it or not, there’s a 2005 video from a TV studio where he discusses it, which was 5 years before any negotiations with Floyd took place.

He couldn’t have known sat on that TV show that he’d be publicly embroiled in a drug testing row with Floyd Mayweather 5 years later.

That 2005 video is proof that there was an issue, which means that he had a legitimate request.

People are focusing on this, but can’t give a legitimate reason why Floyd took his 14 day cut off request off of the table when Manny went back and agreed to it.

 

Yes, I like to deal in facts myself.

 

When I asked for proof of this surgery, you claim to have sent proof, which you never did, so are we gonna go over that little game again?

 

That was due to how I phrased my previous post.

I’ve edited it.

Morales was quoted after the fight as saying that he didn’t feel Manny’s power at all.

He changed his opinion after the following fights.

Who’s offered up any excuses?

The two blood vials that were taken weren’t highlighted to excuse Manny’s loss to Morales.

They were highlighted to prove that there was a legitimate reason for his request for a cut off.

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&r...-fight/6191/&usg=AOvVaw3sK5v_ZO0Kq6DVDlT11rwI

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&r...ght-wrap-up/&usg=AOvVaw31okYT44Yc9QpS6AbC0c4V

 

Why were you mentioning his tattoos?

 

No.

Just bad grammar from myself.

I’ve edited the post.

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=12&ved=2ahUKEwi9osO1vrTpAhVoShUIHZRoCEcQFjALegQIAhAB&url=http://www.nowboxing.com/2009/12/2005-video-evidence-proves-why-pacquiao-refuses-to-take-blood-before-fight/6191/&usg=AOvVaw3sK5v_ZO0Kq6DVDlT11rwI

Whatever your opinion is, the video in that article was verified as being from 2005.

 

I’m not touchy at all.

I just think it’s absolutely pathetic to try and pretend that Manny was in his prime against Floyd, just so it enhances his win.

It’s pure and utter desperation.

If you started a thread and did a poll, you’d get laughed off of the forum.

Sure, he was still an elite fighter. But prime?

Ha!

Nobody thinks that Floyd was in his prime at the same age, when he fought Canelo and Maidana.

It’s absurd.

Regarding his shoulder, it wasn’t an excuse.

Sure, even if he’d have been fully fit, Floyd may have comprehensively beaten him anyway. But he was hampered by it.

He had surgery on it about 5 days after the fight.

Or are you saying that it was faked?

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=2ahUKEwjd1evNwbTpAhUpRhUIHQemAI4QFjACegQICxAG&url=https://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/story/_/id/12837213/manny-pacquiao-undergoes-surgery-torn-right-rotator-cuff&usg=AOvVaw3mx0Rh8AAPOM3n8XUyNlPY

 

Why would Manny have mentioned it to his corner?

They already knew going into the fight.

 

Okay.

If you want us to respect what’s written in this article, then you can do the same for the one I’ve posted.

The one I’ve posted has an actual quote from the surgeon.

Surgeons obviously don’t operate on patients unless it’s absolutely necessary.

It proves that Manny was hampered in the fight.

Unless of course you want us to respect your article while you just ignore mine.

 

This post is about Floyd’s resume but because it uncomfortable for you haters you want to discuss other things apart from the truth of his resume. I don’t care about Manny’s excuses, he lost so all he needed to do was accept his loss like a man and congratulate Floyd.

 

Excuses excuses excuses. After every defeat there is an injury! If you lose don’t make excuses only winners are entitled to excuses because they don’t come across as sour losers. Manny might have injured his shoulders by swinging and missing all night.

 

Here you go again.

Why do I have to be a hater?

Ha!


Me: “I think Floyd may not have wanted to have fought Oscar in a rematch”

You: “You’re a hater!”


You are completely incapable of having a debate.


You have just posted an article to prove that Floyd had surgery.

Fine. I’ve no issue with that at all.

Please answer me this question though:

How can you post that up as proof that Floyd had surgery, but then say that Manny had an excuse, when I have also posted an article up, with a direct quote from his surgeon?


Basically:

You want us to respect your article, but you have no intentions of respecting mine or anyone else’s.

Your article is proof.

Mine isn’t.


How can anybody debate you when you’re acting in this manner?

 

The correct spelling is: Incapable. Again Floyd won Manny lost. Losers can’t make excuses. Winners can tell us if they had any injuries.

 

What on earth are talking about you absolute nut?

YOU have just posted an article up stating that Floyd had surgery.

I have also posted up an article of where Manny had surgery, WHICH INCLUDES A DIRECT QUOTE FROM HIS SURGEON WHO CARRIED OUT THE OPERATION.

Here it is again:

https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=2ahUKEwjd1evNwbTpAhUpRhUIHQemAI4QFjACegQICxAG&url=https://www.espn.co.uk/boxing/story/_/id/12837213/manny-pacquiao-undergoes-surgery-torn-right-rotator-cuff&usg=AOvVaw3mx0Rh8AAPOM3n8XUyNlPY

How can it have been an excuse?

Good grief man.

Have a word with yourself.