Roberto Duran vs. Joe Brown

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by William Walker, May 15, 2020.


  1. Xplosive

    Xplosive Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    24,373
    10,022
    Jun 23, 2008
    Posters are often in a rush to pick against prime Duran.

    I agree, Old Jones didn't have the tools.
     
    roughdiamond and young griffo like this.
  2. Mod-Mania

    Mod-Mania Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,718
    2,901
    Aug 12, 2012
    Duran by late TKO.
     
  3. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,423
    3,934
    Jun 28, 2009
    Sort of what Xplosive, griffo, Robert, Mike Gould said. Old Bones was a great fighter, a lanky, hard-hitting shrewd counterpuncher and I could see him stinging Duran with left hook counters off of the occasional wild overhand right from Roberto and maybe shortening some punches at mid to close range to put up a similar level of resistance as De Jesus or maybe Buchanan to lesser degree: Kenny was tougher despite Brown being a more concussive puncher.

    It's just hard to see a man who really struggled with the smart rough-housing and pressure of Charnley and Rosi - very, very good though they both were - ultimately having much joy against a next-level free-wheeling tyrant like Duran when he's instinctively rolling under incoming fire while lashing away with fluid attacks to the head and body from those intuitively placed angles that are so hard to both defend against and counter.
     
  4. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,802
    29,243
    Jun 2, 2006
    Brown was 34 against Charnley when he was taken the distance,and33 against Rosi.Pretty old for a lightweight.
     
  5. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,423
    3,934
    Jun 28, 2009
    I find it hard to pin down his prime though mate because he was an Indian summer type who grew with experience and aged superbly, honing his style when his physicality was arguably declining. Not too long prior he'd beaten Dupas and Kenny Lane who are among his best wins, though I suppose how much better the version who beat Smith, Zulueta etc was than the 33 year old version is debatable at least. Or if he was a slightly better fighter in his run to the title maybe, I haven't seen footage from then tbh, though he had the odd loss then too.

    Great to see you back by the way!
     
    roughdiamond and mcvey like this.
  6. mcvey

    mcvey VIP Member Full Member

    97,802
    29,243
    Jun 2, 2006
    Thanks T R. I doubt it will be for long!
     
    Tin_Ribs likes this.
  7. young griffo

    young griffo Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,500
    7,271
    May 18, 2006
    What happened this time Mac?

    I hope you hang around mate. The forum is better for having you here.
     
    Tin_Ribs likes this.
  8. William Walker

    William Walker Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,901
    9,154
    Apr 9, 2020
    all of the lightweights mentioned COULD beat Duran, but probably wouldn't. He was the most well rounded, and had stamina and toughness that you couldn't overcome. But if anyone could beat Duran, it would definitely be Whitaker, Armstrong, Arguello, Brown, and Ortiz. Think about it, DeJesus beat prime Duran, and he wasn't as good as those guys.
     
  9. JohnThomas1

    JohnThomas1 VIP Member

    53,138
    45,153
    Apr 27, 2005
    The bolded is such an apt description and is one of the reasons Duran is such a monster. Even the most technically proficient (and speedy for that matter particularly at the lower weights) are going to be caught on a reasonably regular basis.
     
    roughdiamond and Tin_Ribs like this.
  10. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    4,423
    3,934
    Jun 28, 2009
    I never get why people get banned on here tbh by barring obvious instances.

    Yeah @mcvey, have a read of the Golovkin-Chang thread if you're in need of a laugh and wondering if anything's changed.