Where does Félix Trinidad rank among the greatest boxers of the last thirty years?

He’s became very underrated. One of the fighters who’s poor performances are most scrutinized like the Wright one which really should be tossed out.

He was a great fighter, dominant in most of his fights, very consistent and though fairly one dimensional, that dimension was incredible. He unified two hot divisions in back to back years, beat two young unbeaten champions at 154 on the back of his 15 defenses and unifying at 147. The Joppy performance and win was greatly impressive too.

I would say he’s a top 10 of the last 30 years. Probably around 7-10.

 

This is spot on. People like to refer to him as some one dimensional fraud, but that couldn't be further from the truth. Trinidad was a killer at 147 - he was like a seek and destroy robot - and it took huge middleweight beating on him for 11+ rounds to finally stop him. During his comeback he was a part time fighter and looked lackluster, but that shouldn't define him.

 

Eh... I'd say roughly
#1

 

It is weird to exclude heavyweights since traditionally pound for pound lists have always tended to favour the smaller, faster fighters over heavyweights anyway. I think Mike Tyson was the last heavyweight to top most people’s P4P lists and that was over 30 years ago.

 

Don't undersell him.

He's asked far weirder questions than this.

 

I never thought of that, but you're right. The smaller guys get points for being more dynamic and versatile and all the heavyweights' power gets overlooked.

 

I think an extremely high percentage of his questions are copied from elsewhere.

 

Well, we'll take Lewis, Wlad and Evander out of the picture then I'd say a make shift list looks like this:

Manny Pacquiao
Floyd Mayweather
Bernard Hopkins
Roy Jones Jr
James Toney
Érik Morales
Juan Manuel Márquez
Oscar De La Hoya

Tito would definitely be after those imo.

 

How about Sweet Pea and Roman Gonzalez?

 

I put the following definitely ahead:

Whitaker
Jones
Hopkins
Pacquaio
Mayweather
Marquez

I have him narrowly ahead of:

Calzaghe
Morales
Barrera
Toney

So I have him #7. Toney, sure has more “skills” but was also far more passive and if we are going to punish Tito for losing to Hopkins, a debatable decision over De La Hoya and a post prime loss against Wright, then surely Toney’s either way win over Johnson, gift over Tiberi, losses to Tiberi and Johnson factor in? Also, was his late surge at cruiser and heavy entirely clean?

 

Both of those above him too.