Do the belts really matter?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Who_Necks, May 22, 2020.



  1. ashishwarrior

    ashishwarrior VIP Member Full Member

    33,204
    10,892
    Apr 19, 2010
    The
    Wbc and wba have by their own doing become meaningless
     
  2. Reinhardt

    Reinhardt Boxing Junkie Full Member

    11,795
    15,096
    Oct 4, 2016
    No, with 4 belts why would it?
     
  3. caligula4

    caligula4 Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,764
    885
    Jul 13, 2011
    The belts matter. Being a champion is what elite sportsmen aspire to be and will remember when their careers are over, but ultimately there are too many of them and too much politics and jargon involved
     
  4. Wig

    Wig Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,607
    3,997
    May 31, 2010
    Which is precisely why they don’t matter.
     
    Momus likes this.
  5. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,193
    13,223
    Feb 13, 2014
    The belt is only as good as its champion, ultimately. They do matter but not as much as they maybe should.
     
    Accurate, im sparticus and Wizbit1013 like this.
  6. Wizbit1013

    Wizbit1013 Drama go, and don't come back Full Member

    12,287
    15,484
    Mar 17, 2018
    Spot on

    With the HW champs we currently have, they matter as your fighting for legacy and a ton of cash
    Now if Charles Martin was a champ today people may make more money elsewhere and only be fighting for legacy and decent cash
     
  7. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia Trivial Annoyance Gold Medalist Full Member

    16,193
    13,223
    Feb 13, 2014
    The Prince is on the comeback trail my friend, notice how these SHOOK champions don't want to mention his name?
     
  8. Wizbit1013

    Wizbit1013 Drama go, and don't come back Full Member

    12,287
    15,484
    Mar 17, 2018
    The God amongst men

    What a legend
     
    Twentyman likes this.
  9. ShadesOfAli

    ShadesOfAli Active Member Full Member

    646
    597
    Sep 3, 2019
    It’s like the difference between Man United v Liverpool in the Champions League final compared to them playing in the Charity Shield.

    People watch the Charity Shield anyway but the real silverware (Belts) is what they’re playing for.
     
  10. Patter983

    Patter983 Active Member Full Member

    1,479
    1,672
    Jul 20, 2018
    Is it balls haha

    with or without the belts this fight is absolutely massive!! No one gives two shits about a match between anyone who contests the community shield !
     
  11. Murderers' Row

    Murderers' Row Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,452
    5,243
    Apr 23, 2020
    I never get tired of beating the dippers.
     
  12. Momus

    Momus Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,732
    2,555
    Nov 27, 2010
    Simple answer is that the belts only matter when they need to.

    It's the Schrödinger's Cat principle - they are both the pinnacle of boxing, and completely meaningless at the same time. Fighters can devote their entire career to winning one, and then drop the same belt because their mandatory challenger has too many syllables in his surname.

    Like everything else, at this point they are a promotional tool.
     
  13. Jamzy ⭐

    Jamzy ⭐ Active Member Full Member

    1,471
    962
    Oct 8, 2018
    Don't care feck all about the belts
     
  14. UKboxingfan

    UKboxingfan Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,523
    4,420
    Nov 28, 2018
    Didnt Eubank Jr turn down a vacant WBC title shot for peanuts to fight Degale on PPV? Says it all.
     
    Scissors likes this.
  15. jm2729v

    jm2729v Active Member Full Member

    884
    620
    Jun 15, 2016
    Belts do matter especially in an era where the top fighters are looking for an excuse not to fight each other.
     
    Who_Necks likes this.