I only gave Wilder 3 rounds. Even the last round is debatable as a 10-8. The rules are you take a point off for every knock down but Fury clearly dominated before and after he was dropped in the 12th so I don’t see why it couldn’t be a 9-9 round.
Unfortunately both of their fights showed a bias toward American fighters and I lost respect for Bayless during the rematch.
It's 10 point must. Someone has to be given 10 points. You can score it 10-9 for Wilder- a knockdown doesn't guarantee 10-8.
2 rounds, that's it. One could argue that round 12 was an even round, considering Fury came back and controlled the rest of the round. These guys fought 17 rounds and DW won 2. This coming from a guy that was going for Wilder and not a huge fan of Fury. If a third fight materializes, I will be going for Wilder yet again. Not because I love Wilder or dispise Fury. Simply put, some of the over the top Fury fans need to be upset, same as the G and Kovalev fans. Deep down, I know DW ain't the guy to do it, but it would be funnier than hell if he did.
The first fight has fallen into complete irrelevance. The second fight was decisive enough to make it so.
If I could vote for Fury twice I would. Wilder did not win that fight, and only a very deluded person thinks that he did.
What makes you think this is true? As in where did you find this information? I mean it’s not true but I’ve seen quite a few posters say this so I was wondering where this comes from
Fury won the fight but Karma is sweet. Had he not been robbed in the first fight he would not have changed his approach for the rematch
Fury CLEARLY won this fight. At best I have Wilder winning 3 rounds.. & that was peak Wilder v the worst version of Fury ever..