Does Dempsey win a title after 1937?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by DanDaly, Jun 6, 2020.


Does Dempsey win a title after 1937?

  1. Yes

  2. No

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. DanDaly

    DanDaly Active Member Full Member

    574
    592
    Apr 28, 2020
    When is the last year or time period that Dempsey would be able to win a title?

    At Heavyweight.
     
    Last edited: Jun 6, 2020
  2. roughdiamond

    roughdiamond Ridin' the rails... Full Member

    10,243
    19,570
    Jul 25, 2015
    *ahem*

    2020. You didn't specify the weight hehe.
     
  3. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,429
    8,877
    Oct 8, 2013
    1930 Schmeling beats him. Schmeling’s right hand was far heavier than Tunney’s, that put him down and much harder than Sharkey who had Dempsey badly hurt in round 1. Dempsey was too inactive as champion and post Firpo it catches up to him.
     
    mark ant likes this.
  4. The Long Count

    The Long Count Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    15,429
    8,877
    Oct 8, 2013
    I now realize I misunderstood what you meant. Prime Dempsey would beat Patterson imo so that takes him til the late 50’s. He could def best Leon spinks too etc
     
  5. DanDaly

    DanDaly Active Member Full Member

    574
    592
    Apr 28, 2020
    Edited.
     
    roughdiamond likes this.
  6. janitor

    janitor VIP Member Full Member

    71,602
    27,273
    Feb 15, 2006
    I would give him an excellent chance of winning it now!
     
  7. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,111
    20,623
    Jul 30, 2014
    Do you mean if he'd stuck around until 1937, or if he had come at a later time and peaked in 1937 (or around there)? Because those two are very different answers.
     
    Nighttrain likes this.
  8. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,111
    20,623
    Jul 30, 2014
    Yeah I see him beating Joshua. Not sure about Fury.
     
    Thor Odinson likes this.
  9. DanDaly

    DanDaly Active Member Full Member

    574
    592
    Apr 28, 2020
    Not sure how I could say it in simpler terms. I’m asking if Jack Dempsey, at his best (whenever you consider that), could win a title in any era after 1937 or if you don’t think he’d even win the title had he fought in 1937 instead of the 1910s/20s what would be the last year ish that he would win one.

    that make sense?
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    61,846
    46,580
    Feb 11, 2005
    Carnera, yes. Probably against the version of Walcott that Marciano faced. Leon Spinks, at least the version that beat Ali, would be a toss-up.
     
  11. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    401,857
    83,628
    Nov 30, 2006
    Getting on a bit at 42yo, wasn't he? :D
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  12. swagdelfadeel

    swagdelfadeel Obsessed with Boxing

    19,111
    20,623
    Jul 30, 2014
    Easily, I would favor him over a lot of champions including; Marciano, both Spinks, Baer, Carnera, Joshua, Walcott, Charles, Braddock, Schmeling, and others I'm probably forgetting.
     
    DanDaly likes this.
  13. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    81,845
    22,054
    Sep 15, 2009
    He would have done a more destructive job than Leon Spinks.
     
  14. Charlietf

    Charlietf Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,503
    Feb 25, 2020
    Yes but he would not be a dominant champion, Jack dempsey would be a monster in bareknuckle fights but under boxing rules is very overrated.
     
  15. Charlietf

    Charlietf Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,935
    2,503
    Feb 25, 2020
    Can't be agree about Joshua mate. Walcott and Charles would school Dempsey but is possible that he could land the Ko shot late.
     
    swagdelfadeel likes this.