Can Tyson's Ko of Botha and Ettiene be considered Lucky Punches?

The White Buffalo: "I was ahead on the cards, it was a lucky punch". And he's right. Botha got careless and lost the fight:

This content is protected

 

Lucky punches?

Bullshits. The straight hand that KOed Botha was as powerful and accurate as that one of Lewis that KOed the same Tyson in 2002 imo.
The counter-straight that destroyed Etienne would have knocked down/out most of HWs of the past, the present and the future.

This content is protected

This content is protected

 

Tyson's feet were set, he was in proper range, he aimed and shot the right hand straight at Botha's chest/chin. Please define what you mean by lucky because it seems that your premise is non sensical...............

 

A guy like this even at 80% doesn’t get lucky ,he’s always a punch from ending someone’s night and why he could still do it now.

This content is protected

 

No here is a vid of Mike KO`ing people with his jab followed by the right hand, he always had a devastating 1-2. 'make two punches sound like one' b-boom, awesome. jab-straight right on Botha`s chin:

This content is protected

 

Jab right hand, Mike`s 1-2 was awesome.

 

That 1-2 that hit Botha was quick as ****, the right hand came instantly after the jab, Mike was great at that.

 

This

 

Got lucky against Khan, lol all he would have had to have done was wait until the next round, Khan always left himself open and was fighting wild, Garcia is a dangerous counter puncher.

 

I rewatched that McCall's punch many times. At the beginning I also thought it was a lucky punch. Youre right when you say it was a no looking punch but it was not lucky imo... I think McCall searched and wished that combo left-right as the same Lewis did with Rahman II knocking him out ...besides McCall hit the target when he was attacking the opponent and not when he was defending himself from Lewis.

 

Ettienne's chin was done BYT he fought Tyson. I think Fres O dropped him like, 5 times prior.